Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet

[lutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lutz Donnerhacke)]

* Bill Stewart wrote:
>At 05:25 PM 3/9/98 -0800, Hal Finney wrote:
>>This is a proposal for a new packet type, the "attribute packet,"
>>which is a generalization of the userid packet.  Attribute packets can
>>appear in a PGP key structure anywhere a userid packet could appear.
>
>Can you get by with the current "Notation Data" subpacket type,
>or is the 2-octet length field too limiting?

No. It should be used to set up other USER IDs! You might certify a picture
or voice snapshot instead of a name.