[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet

To: ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet
From: Jack Repenning <jackr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:26:47 -0800
In-reply-to: <199803192221.RAA26653@users.invweb.net>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx

>>On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Jack Repenning wrote:
>
>>The end goal is (I think) the ability to
>>-> express the meaning of your signature ...

We can stop discussing this now ... I wasn't proposing it, merely trying to
explain someone else's proposal - but it turns out, I was completely wrong,
anyway!


        /////   Informix Software Inc.	Jack Repenning
     ////\ /	  Config/Release Mgmt		jackr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    ///// /     4100 Bohannon Drive		M/S: 4100/2
   ///// /      Menlo Park, CA 94025		FAX: 650/926-6571
  ///// /       PAGE:  800/782-9089		VOICE: 650/926-1044
 ///// /        PGP/RSA: D24B E2C2 9AFB 7C24 : 7E59 7885 525D 644E
///// PGP/DSS: 955C 44AD 8FCE 77D4 9494 : 4AB2 51F1 3EED 3B82 E870

References:
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet
  - From: Christopher Creutzig
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet
  - From: William H. Geiger III

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet
Next by Date: Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet
Next by thread: Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread