In <3.0.3.32.19980325135801.00b59ac0@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 03/25/98 at 04:58 PM, Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxx> said: >An excellent point -- there needs to be clarification there. I've added >text that says, "...it MUST be computed from the finished (encrypted, >signed, etc.) message in a deterministic fashion..." >How's that? I had not thought of leaking key data this way. If the group feels this is a real concern couldn't the same type of "leaking" be done with the "boundary" in the MIME headers? -- --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/esecure.html --------------------------------------------------------------- Tag-O-Matic: You said Windows was a Power Tool???
Attachment:
pgp00034.pgp
Description: PGP signature