[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3

To: Hal Finney <hal@xxxxxxxx>, ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx, tzeruch@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3
From: Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 13:48:19 -0800
In-reply-to: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx

At 12:27 PM 3/26/98 -0800, Hal Finney wrote:

   [BTW, Jon, I notice that the wording in section 5.3 still uses the old
   term Conventional Encrypted Session Key in a few places.]
   
Thank you.

	Jon



-----
Jon Callas                                  jon@xxxxxxx
CTO, Total Network Security                 4200 Bohannon Drive
Network Associates, Inc.                    Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 473-2860                              
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
              665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628           (RSA)

References:
- Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3
  - From: Hal Finney

Prev by Date: Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3
Next by Date: Which is the preferred preference?
Previous by thread: Re: Obvious (?) question about interoperability
Next by thread: Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread