Re: 5.2.2 clarification

[Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxx>]

At 02:15 PM 3/27/98 -0500, nospam-seesignature@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
   "The data being signed is hashed, and then the signature data from the
   version number through..." 
                 ^
             inclusive ?
   
Inclusive. I added the word. This is redundant with the new section on
constructing a signature. I've left it in on the grounds that more
information is better. If it's really confusing, let me know and I can
replace it with a reference to the new section.

	Jon



-----
Jon Callas                                  jon@xxxxxxx
CTO, Total Network Security                 4200 Bohannon Drive
Network Associates, Inc.                    Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 473-2860                              
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
              665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628           (RSA)