Re: UserID Revocation

["William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In <slrn6hmtuv.k2.lutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 03/27/98 
   at 09:56 AM, lutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lutz Donnerhacke) said:

>* Christopher Creutzig wrote:
>>On 11 Mar 1998, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
>>
>>-> >think that there are some more pressing issues like the ability to revoke
>>-> >userID's if modifying the format is still open game.
>>-> 
>>-> No. It's already solved an implemented since about than a year.
>>
>> I haven't seen it in the spec yet. Your reference implementation does not
>>define anything, it *only* implements the spec and serves as something
>>people can check their programs for interoperability with. It had been
>>solved with the old key format, though...

>It is a feature of PGP2.6.3(i)n since months.

Yes but that does not replace the need for it to be outlined in the spec.

- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/esecure.html                        
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Tag-O-Matic: The sad thing about Windows bashing is it's all true.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000

iQCVAwUBNRwR149Co1n+aLhhAQGhBAQAprbhuSeX6Ce+65fjmTF38BiG1q9+PqOt
BXy4eOB/V9rlqmBD6R/kmGrLk8Q/UAoS4Kw3S4ZemKJowZ83KpcnKOdCJCpaSIqM
KuHYaDRELimwIAFIyGAmt5w7JurCXhLWJaZxnxYWsaMGz9W+vG6F0sqd/61jH/x/
ACpdsuAUF4s=
=vi4E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----