Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor

[Hal Finney <hal@xxxxxxxx>]

tzeruch@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> I managed to get conventional SKESKs working, and pgpv 5.0 even understand
> them, but I must ascii armor the file, or it says opening /dev/null and
> does nothing.  I tried both s2k alone and s2k encrypted key.

I don't remember how much support is in the 5.0 Unix version.  Why don't
you post a SKESK conventional message to the list, tell us what the
passphrase is, and people can try decrypting it with different versions of
PGP.

Hal