[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 128 bit block ciphers

To: ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 128 bit block ciphers
From: Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 08:51:16 +0200
In-reply-to: <>; from dontspam-tzeruch@ceddec.com on Mon, Jun 29, 1998 at 08:37:11PM -0400
Mail-followup-to: ietf-open-pgp@imc.org
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx

dontspam-tzeruch@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

> This version or next version?  For this version I would leave a note that
> the CFB is going to change as I noted above - as I pointed out, all
> current algorithms happen to use 8 byte blocks.  The next version should
> define this correctly though.  I think I can interoperate with everything

I agree with Tom, leave it as it is.  We can do these changes in the
next version.


Werner

References:
- Re: 128 bit block ciphers
  - From: Jon Callas
- Re: 128 bit block ciphers
  - From: dontspam-tzeruch

Prev by Date: Re: areas of spec incomplete? (Re: Question and note)
Next by Date: What is MAY NOT
Previous by thread: Re: 128 bit block ciphers
Next by thread: Re: 128 bit block ciphers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread