[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Algorithm Decisions

To: Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Algorithm Decisions
From: dontspam-tzeruch@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 11:14:25 -0400
Cc: ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3.0.3.32.19980701171418.00bdb850@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx

On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Jon Callas wrote:

> How does this sound to people as a solution?
> 
> The algorithm IDs for EC, ECDSA, TIGER, HAVAL, X9.42 and whatever else I've
> missed get marked as reserved. I'll add a section in algorithm notes that
> says why they're reserved.
> 
> 	Jon

Fine with me.  That way they can still be developed outside of compliance
and the next version will be able to define the details (or simply have
OIDS assigned as needed).

--- reply to tzeruch - at - ceddec - dot - com ---

References:
- Algorithm Decisions
  - From: Jon Callas

Prev by Date: Re: undefined MAY algorithm example
Next by Date: Re: Algorithm Decisions
Previous by thread: Algorithm Decisions
Next by thread: Re: Algorithm Decisions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread