[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Algorithm Decisions

To: ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Algorithm Decisions
From: "John W. Noerenberg" <jwn2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 11:29:48 -0700
Cc: plambert@xxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Lambert), Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxx>, uri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <9807010643.AA29576@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <88256634.00049D17.00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Paul Lambert" at Jun 30, 98 06:57:19 pm
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx

At 10:15 AM -0700 7/8/98, John  W. Noerenberg wrote:
>...in the interest of bringing the discussion to a close, ...

<sigh>

Forgive my lack of clarity.

I'm endorsing Jon's plan to mark algorithm IDs as reserved with an
explanation in notes for algorithms which are under-specified.
john noerenberg
jwn2@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Anyone who breathes the spirit of American roots and values knows
  instinctively that censorship is the feeble response of an insecure,
  beleaguered society.
  -- Russell Sherman, "Piano Pieces", 1997
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
- Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note)
  - From: Uri Blumenthal
- Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note)
  - From: Paul Lambert
- Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note)
  - From: John W. Noerenberg

Prev by Date: Re: Algorithm patents a US only problem?
Next by Date: Re: Long Holiday?
Previous by thread: Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note)
Next by thread: Algorithm Decisions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread