Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call

[Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

dontspam-tzeruch@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

> And will your implmentation correctly process all combinations of all
> algorithms?  This is really hard to get right, and it is better not to
> support something than to support it badly or incorrectly.

I#m not talking about ElGamal signatures. But due to the fact that
gnupg ElGamal keys may be used for signatures I assign them the 20.

The default key is a DSA primary key with an ElGamal key used for
encryption (but this one has the id 20 and not 16 - so it MAY be used
for signatures).  Never mind, I#ll put 16 into the encrypted packets
even for keys which have 20 as algorithm identifier.


Werner