[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuPG and trailing whitespace handling
At 11:05 AM 2/11/99 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
|Okay, so I implement it like PGP and make a remark that GnuPG does not
|follow the RFC :-)
I don't know how to interpret the smiley, so I apologize if this is a
If you follow the RFC, you will be backwards compatible.
If you want to be forwards compatible (meaning that you accept things old
versions generate), all you have to do is not generate an error when an old
version fails to blank-trim.
IETF standards are not handcuffs. You are always permitted to do more than
them. This is especially true in cases where you accept as valid something
that fails slightly.
Jon Callas jon@xxxxxxx
CTO, Total Network Security 3965 Freedom Circle
Network Associates, Inc. Santa Clara, CA 95054
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628 (RSA)