Re: Sample Twofish message

[Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jon Callas <jcallas@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Do we agree now that the right thing to do is to start with a 16-byte IV,
> encrypt 16 bytes, sync with 2 and then continue? That's what I thought we

ACK.

> all agreed on. If we agree that, then we don't have a problem, we have an
> elided description that needs to be expanded when we revise the RFC. I
> believe, though, that that's the right thing to do, work with full blocksizes.

We use a 8 byte IV for encrypting the secret key material; see
section 5.5.3.  Do we keep this 8 bytes or extend it to the blocksize?

-- 
Werner Koch at guug.de           www.gnupg.org           keyid 621CC013