Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I like Tom's proposal. If someone can define the extension to the > signature packet (or a new one) I'll add it to GnuPG ASAP. Hmmm, no comments on this for a week. Does this mean I should design a new packet or extend the signature packet specs? -- Werner Koch at guug.de www.gnupg.org keyid 621CC013