[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SPAM ?

To: ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SPAM ?
From: Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 18:56:56 +0100
In-reply-to: <>; from ulrich.moser@systor.com on Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 08:41:50AM +0100
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-open-pgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-open-pgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-open-pgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.1i

 On Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 08:41:50AM +0100
 ulrich.moser@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I can confirm this and would also suggest to take appropriate counter
> measures.

I don't think that it is needed.  It only seems so that there is so
much UCE becuase this list as migrated to a very low traffic one.

It is not easy to have a junk free ML when it is an open list; you
have to maintain filter rules and even when you use ORBS, junk will
come through from time to time.   What I do in this case is simply
cleaning it up from the mail archive.

I don't think that it is a good idea to have a closed ML, mainly
because it is not easy to have anoymous poster.

By the way, anything new on an updated RFC?

-- 
Werner Koch at guug.de           www.gnupg.org           keyid 621CC013

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPAM ?
  - From: sen_ml

References:
- Re: SPAM ?
  - From: ulrich . moser

Prev by Date: Re: SPAM ?
Next by Date: Subscription Request
Previous by thread: Re: SPAM ?
Next by thread: Re: SPAM ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread