Re: 2.1, 2.2 and 10.2 Clarification re sigs.

[sen_ml@xxxxxxxxxxx]

From: Erron Criddle <ejc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 2.1, 2.2 and 10.2 Clarification re sigs.
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 13:39:02 +0800
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.0.20000610123516.00b52f78@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

...

> "Signed Message :- Signature Packet, OpenPGP Message | One-Pass
> Signed Message"

may be this was meant to be:

  Signed Message :- OpenPGP Message, Signature Packet | One-Pass Signed Message

?

for reference, looking through the openpgp packets found in pgp
messages i have received, the pattern of "literal data packet followed
by signature packet" does appear.