Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16

[sen_ml@xxxxxxxxxxx]

From: "L. Sassaman" <rabbi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.QNWS_2.0007101128180.10157-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 hal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > That seems OK, or perhaps you could use an SSL (TLS) session using the
> > PGP key to authenticate the client.  In any case I don't think this
> > mechanism should be documented in 2440.
> 
> That's fine, but I do think that this definately needs to be
> documented. If 2440 isn't the place, then we need to start work on a
> keyserver draft.

have you started a draft?