[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Encoding of "features" subpacket

At 11:51 PM -0400 8/23/01, Michael Young wrote:
>At first, I accepted the explanation in the current draft, that this act like
>other "preferences".  But the only preferences encoded that way are
>algorithms lists; but algorithms are already encoded as bytes, and in
>the lists, order matters.  Features feel more like the keyserver or key
>flags, which are bit-encoded.
>

Good point. Anyone else want to weigh in? I'm now leaning to changing it.

	Jon