Re: What's left before a new RFC?

[Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/19/2002 11:47 PM, "Florian Weimer" <Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> 3.2 is lacking a hint to implementors that the bit count feild for
> encrypted MPIs reflects the number of bits in the decrypted MPI (IOW,
> encrypted MPIs might not be well-formed as required by 3.2).
> 

Thank you. I wrote as the last paragraph of 3.2:

Also note that when an MPI is encrypted, the length refers to the plaintext
MPI. It may be ill-formed in its ciphertext.


> There's a formatting error in the second table of section 5.2.3.16.

Thanks. David Shaw also pointed that one out and it's fixed.

    Jon