Re: Notary signatures

[Len Sassaman <rabbi@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jon Callas wrote:

>
> I like the idea of a notary signature that only signs a signature packet.
> This would mean your signer doesn't even need to see the document that's
> being notarized, which has a certain panache to it.
>
> How about if I do this:
>
> * Write up a description of a notary signature.
>
> * Change the "revocation target" subpacket to be a "signature target"
> subpacket so it can work double duty
>
> How's that sound?

Sounds great to me. Would work perfectly for what I want to do.


--Len.