[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Musings on Notary signatures

To: john.dlugosz@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Musings on Notary signatures
From: David Shaw <dshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:18:57 -0400
Cc: ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: john.dlugosz@kodak.com, ietf-openpgp@imc.org
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.26i

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:17:03PM -0500, john.dlugosz@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> And, he would need a standard way to put the serial number into the
> proposed 0x50 packet.

Signature notation subpacket.

David

-- 
   David Shaw  |  dshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  |  WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
   "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
      We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson

References:
- Re: Musings on Notary signatures
  - From: john . dlugosz

Prev by Date: Re: Musings on Notary signatures
Next by Date: Re: Musings on Notary signatures
Previous by thread: Re: Musings on Notary signatures
Next by thread: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-05.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread