[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt
Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 8/12/02 7:07 AM, "Florian Weimer" <Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> IMHO, the draft does not specify the semantics of expiration in a way
>> which would warrant such statement. I don't believe we can agree on a
>> specific set of expiration semantics even in the limited circle of
>> this WG.
>> BTW, the referenced paper (http://www.counterpane.com/pgp-attack.html)
>> is definitely worth a read.
> That particular change was correcting a typo in the previous draft. It has
> nothing to do with the new paper.
Oh, I didn't want to imply *that* (hence "BTW").
I still think that the change is misleading.
Florian Weimer Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
University of Stuttgart http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/
RUS-CERT fax +49-711-685-5898