[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Suggested DER Prefixes

To: <ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Suggested DER Prefixes
From: "Richard Laager" <rlaager@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 09:44:11 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: Wikstrom Telecom Internet
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jon Callas wrote:
>            In fact, there are those who feel safer with AES 
> at 128 than at
> 256.

Any particular reason(s)? Is there any merit to these reason(s)?

Thanks,
Richard Laager

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/

iQA/AwUBPtYb1m31OrleHxvOEQJUuwCghKCDPQ4NtBRi+zkz425uNJzO5DoAoOZa
Hlg8Xxym5RIuZ7TJ0+Fvg52Q
=tH7T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes
  - From: Jon Callas
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes
  - From: Derek Atkins

References:
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes
  - From: Jon Callas

Prev by Date: Re: Suggested DER Prefixes
Next by Date: Re: Suggested DER Prefixes
Previous by thread: Re: Suggested DER Prefixes
Next by thread: Re: Suggested DER Prefixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread