[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: key flag for authentication

To: Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: key flag for authentication
From: David Shaw <dshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:13:41 -0400
Cc: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Jon Callas <jon@callas.org>, OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:57:29AM -0700, Jon Callas wrote:
> 
> Is there a consensus for this? I'm happy with anything, myself.

I support it.

David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3rc1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Key available at http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc

iD8DBQE/F0nF4mZch0nhy8kRAluDAJ4uojC6mKKpU5Q/Do/0xy1WNa9PqACg3aiI
kk3p+8QfxeVEV3pejdO8G9E=
=vxOX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: key flag for authentication
  - From: Werner Koch

References:
- Re: key flag for authentication
  - From: Michael Young
- Re: key flag for authentication
  - From: Jon Callas

Prev by Date: Re: Adding in BZ2 compression?
Next by Date: Re: key flag for authentication
Previous by thread: Re: key flag for authentication
Next by thread: Re: key flag for authentication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread