[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: key flag for authentication

To: Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: key flag for authentication
From: Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:54:18 +0200
Cc: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <> (David Shaw's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:13:41 -0400")
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/20.7 (gnu/linux)

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:13:41 -0400, David Shaw said:

>> Is there a consensus for this? I'm happy with anything, myself.

> I support it.

Me too of course.

-- 
Werner Koch                                      <wk@xxxxxxxxx>
The GnuPG Experts                                http://g10code.com
Free Software Foundation Europe	                 http://fsfeurope.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: key flag for authentication
  - From: Derek Atkins

References:
- Re: key flag for authentication
  - From: Michael Young
- Re: key flag for authentication
  - From: Jon Callas
- Re: key flag for authentication
  - From: David Shaw

Prev by Date: Re: key flag for authentication
Next by Date: Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?)
Previous by thread: Re: key flag for authentication
Next by thread: Re: key flag for authentication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread