[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Packets sequences

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:23:03AM +0000, poiboy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>     ENCRYPTED( LITERAL )
>     ENCRYPTED( LITERAL, LITERAL, LITERAL )
>     ENCRYPTED( COMPRESSED( LITERAL ) )
>     ENCRYPTED( COMPRESSED( LITERAL, LITERAL, LITERAL ) )

I'd say all of those are pretty clearly legal as both "LITERAL" and
"LITERAL, LITERAL, LITERAL" are valid OpenPGP messages.

The original poster was asking about:
   ENCRYPTED( LITERAL, LITERAL, COMPRESSED( LITERAL, LITERAL ) )

Whether this one should be legal is a valid question, but as things
stand with the grammar in bis-09, I don't think it is currently legal.

David