[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Whither the 0x40 timestamp signature?

To: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Whither the 0x40 timestamp signature?
From: Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:07:15 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

It's really easy to remove this. Ian has a good reason to remove it. I'll take Ian and David proposing removing it, as 0x50 has more function and is better defined. Does anyone object strongly? Anyone, anyone?

Jon

References:
- Whither the 0x40 timestamp signature?
  - From: David Shaw
- Re: Whither the 0x40 timestamp signature?
  - From: Jon Callas
- Re: Whither the 0x40 timestamp signature?
  - From: David Shaw

Prev by Date: Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME"
Previous by thread: Re: Whither the 0x40 timestamp signature?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread