Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME"

["Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <avbidder@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 24 April 2004 18.59, Len Sassaman wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Jon Callas wrote:

> > I don't hear a consensus for putting this in. If other people want
> > to use notations for an ad-hoc implementation, great.
>
> Okay. Then in the interest of achieving a consensus on this matter, I
> hereby retract my suggestion that the OpenPGP/MIME preference be
> expressed in the notation data field, and endorse David's proposal
> that we add an additional subpacket flag. Are other backers of the
> notation-data proposal willing to do the same? Please speak up.

As I my role here is that of interested bystander and as I won't be the 
one to implement any of the proposed solutions, I say it's up to the 
people really working with this stuff.

greetings
- -- vbi

- -- 
Could this mail be a fake? (Answer: No! - http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481

iKcEARECAGcFAkCMtHVgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJECqqZti935l6tBgAnR8BQrQa097THNslgtT+eNK3
x5kYAJ49/DtpODv8KNxpfkEmQRwdsp5Ozw==
=vqh6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----