[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Encrypted Integrity Protected Data Packet, and MDC packet

To: <vedaal@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Encrypted Integrity Protected Data Packet, and MDC packet
From: Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:45:29 +0200
Cc: <ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200607251618.k6PGIqFm061988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (vedaal@xxxxxxxx's message of "Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:18:51 -0400")
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=5B0358A2; url=finger:wk@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
References: <200607251618.k6PGIqFm061988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6)

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:18, vedaal@xxxxxxxx said:

> it assumes that the hash used in these packets, is SHA-1
>
> is this a 'MUST',

Yes. To avoid rollback attacks.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

References:
- Encrypted Integrity Protected Data Packet, and MDC packet
  - From: vedaal

Prev by Date: Re: Encrypted Integrity Protected Data Packet, and MDC packet
Next by Date: interesting creatures // ? for the open-pgp bestiary
Previous by thread: Encrypted Integrity Protected Data Packet, and MDC packet
Next by thread: Re: Encrypted Integrity Protected Data Packet, and MDC packet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread