[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:21:46PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I sat down with Sam, Tim, and Pasi yesterday to talk about this.
> Basically, it's still possible to have a "standards track" document
> without a working group. They still need to go through an IETF
> Last Call but the AD can sponsor the draft (instead of having a
> WG Group). So long as the drafts are not very contentious (which
> MOST of our proposed work is), we can just continue to drafts
> as individual submissions and an AD (Tim?) could sponsor that
> once we have rough consensus on this list.
> Please let me know how you feel about this.
I think that is just fine, and thanks for working this out.
I have a minor process question though: I've done a couple of Camellia
drafts as "draft-ietf-openpgp-camellia". Do I need to convert that to
"draft-shaw-openpgp-camellia" (i.e. an individual submission) and