[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OpenPGP keys and Suite-B
- To: "Andrey Jivsov" <openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: OpenPGP keys and Suite-B
- From: "David Crick" <dacrick@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:52:05 +0100
- Cc: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=c7xMncbiuGKl1Poe9MOm8BZ+K6T66MqY1CRCegl8dFs=; b=B14D/mLHzxvLHvpe0wVkWUOOJ64vTCv3AzIt5940On3ko5DMIA+L5gKGw4RoocIKnqwwhqozoB/QVH8BPfWzmoRINBMTO2h7Tv3IpHfKtX0t7OQIbMXKYj8t0gn7gj2zLumDPIvGL2jwYxxKFKAvE2uJJKHjUFQF+8tr9KR8zLc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rksLi9aImkSjE3vWcMWkr/UyIYJRYTYlcQeQGB1k0+Ydz2lw/eoepYB/vbRCHNxaAAr5OWq3PWxYN1BmlARdwelhMpSkedcGPGIMyRUwTouU+d5krc+LsE+T7PSEXKu+L850JCzT6DoLNWt+ddZnZCbNNSYwxg495LQHATmiIgA=
- In-reply-to: <481CD4EB.2020309@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <481CD4EB.2020309@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Here is promised ballot. "x" for "yes".
Well unless there is some Microsoft-style vote-stuffing
/ strange consensus counting, it looks like Andrey's C
has carried.
I'm happy with that - I'd rather see Suite-B left out than
"put in with problems."
Andrey - do you want to start a re-write of the submitted
document "without" Suite-B? I will be more than happy to
(then) do my long-promised clarity review - although I'm
sure removing Suite-B will just by itself reduce a lot of the
current complexity and verbiage.