[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Signed + Encrypted messages

To: ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Signed + Encrypted messages
From: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:37:25 +0000 (UTC)
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Newsgroups: iks.lists.ietf-open-pgp
Organization: IKS GmbH Jena
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)

* Hasnain Mujtaba wrote:
> Would it be a safe assumption that the signed component of signed +
> encrypted messages will always be one-pass signatures rather than
> regular signatures?

No.

> Incidently, this seems to be the default case with GPG and PGP.

Yes.

References:
- Signed + Encrypted messages
  - From: Hasnain Mujtaba

Prev by Date: Signed + Encrypted messages
Previous by thread: Signed + Encrypted messages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread