[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Applicability of signed messages as proof of sending



On Sunday 14 August 2005 19:00, Ian G wrote:
> Ben Laurie wrote:
> > On wired networks they are easy for the network admins to mount. The
> > practice is sufficiently commonplace that many corps have their own CA
> > keys in employees' browsers so they can forge X509 certs.
>
> Hmmm.  Is that the sole reason?  Or one of many reasons?
>
> And how often do they conduct this attack?

There are web-proxies on the market which do this in order to be able to 
track HTTPS connections of employees. This is illegal or at least of 
doubtful legality in most European countries, so I can't provide you with 
examples of companies who do this.



	Konrad

Attachment: pgp00134.pgp
Description: PGP signature