On Sunday 14 August 2005 15:43, Ben Laurie wrote: > Signing messages weakens plausible deniability. It may imply some > standing that is not necessarily intended. These things can harm the > sender. On the other hand: not signing weakens the receivers trust into the sender. Just as an example: I can't be sure that your advise to not use signatures comes from a knowledgable OpenPGP expert, it could as well come from a spammer lobbying against the use of crypto because it harms his business model. Konrad
Attachment:
pgp00136.pgp
Description: PGP signature