On Sunday 14 August 2005 15:43, Ben Laurie wrote:
Signing messages weakens plausible deniability. It may imply some standing that is not necessarily intended. These things can harm the sender.
On the other hand: not signing weakens the receivers trust into the sender. Just as an example: I can't be sure that your advise to not use signatures comes from a knowledgable OpenPGP expert, it could as well come from a spammer lobbying against the use of crypto because it harms his business model.
-- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff