Re: Secret key signature packet

[David Shaw <dshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:51:49PM -0400, Adam Back wrote:
> 
> I might be misunderstanding but I read the original poster to be maybe
> hinting at modification detection of the private key ring somehow.
> 
> I am not sure of any attack based on modifying the private key in an
> undetectable way... that would generally seem to make invalid
> signatures, and inability to decrypt.  

Could the original poster be thinking of the Klima-Rosa attack and the
secret key "s2k 254" SHA-1 protection?

David