[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)

To: ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)
From: nagydani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Daniel A. Nagy)
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:31:30 +0200
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:13:08AM -0400, David Shaw wrote:

> I definitely agree they are useful, but given that 2440bis last call
> ends in 16 days and we have no implementations (much less two
> interoperable ones), let's move this to a new RFC.

Sure, the true specs will be in the new RFC, but please don't remove from
RFC2440bis what is already there.

-- 
Daniel

References:
- Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)
  - From: "Hal Finney"
- Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)
  - From: Daniel A. Nagy
- Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)
  - From: Brian G. Peterson
- Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)
  - From: David Shaw

Prev by Date: Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)
Next by Date: Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)
Previous by thread: Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)
Next by thread: Re: Multiple signatures in clearsigned messages (was Re: Cleartext Signatures)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread