[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: V3 secret keys

To: Hal Finney <hal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: V3 secret keys
From: Ben Laurie <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:49:04 +0000
Cc: ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx, nagydani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vedaal@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)

Hal Finney wrote:
>>> Complications have been pointed out regarding sending multiple keys
>>> encrypted with different passphrases, requiring us to explicitly support
>>> multiply-concatenated symmetric-encryption & SKESK packets, which is
>>> not necessary at present.
>> It isn't?
> 
> No, I don't know of any application for that.

How about secret key storage? :-)

Nothing in the current standards would prevent it.

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

References:
- Re: V3 secret keys
  - From: "Hal Finney"

Prev by Date: Re: V3 secret keys
Next by Date: Re: V3 secret keys
Previous by thread: Re: V3 secret keys
Next by thread: V5 key packet format requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread