Re: Rechartering the OpenPGP WG

[Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>
>
> Please respond in the next week so I can collect the responses
> and work on an updated WG Charter.
>

Here's some things I think should be put on the table:

* PFS
* New symmetric ciphers, e.g. Camillia
* Elliptic Curve / Suite B Crypto
* AHS support
* Exotic Signatures (Dan Nagy mentioned this)
* Extended Fingerprints
* OpenPGP/MIME improvements

I'm sure there are others I may have forgotten. Not being on that list  
doesn't mean that I think it should be excluded. Also, being on that  
list only means we will discuss or create drafts. We might decide that  
discussion doesn't get to a draft, or draft doesn't get to RFC. If  
something isn't in the charter, we won't discuss it. So being in the  
charter only means a willingness to discuss.

	Jon


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII

wj8DBQFHkSvdsTedWZOD3gYRAlyTAKC9EisEqMBYp19ea1PtgfFnJRJ/wwCfb07Y
+3CUL9o5c15rBUCzx5x9d70=
=fvLq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----