Re: Ready for Camellia?

[Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>
> I just thought of another reason to leave Camellia-192 out: if we
> leave it out and then change our minds, it's pretty easy to add it
> later (just write a tiny RFC and get an algorithm number for it).  If
> we do put it in now and then change our minds, it's nearly impossible
> to get rid of it later.


As much as I think that 192-bit encryption is stupid, many people have  
impressed upon me reasons it exists, none of which are technical.

I grit my teeth and hold my nose as I say this, but we have to have it.

	Jon


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII

wj8DBQFH2t1IsTedWZOD3gYRAhB2AKC/jO2WcnR61Kbi9YGxhQeLngvynwCeJFUi
94ONpVHASVBxT63b185HqoM=
=ngZw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----