[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ready for Camellia?

To: ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ready for Camellia?
From: Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:30:37 +0100
In-reply-to: <20080313152341.GB1587@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (David Shaw's message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:23:41 -0400")
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=5B0358A2; url=finger:wk@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
References: <sjmtzje1ltx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080311180200.GC4826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sjmzlt3x33m.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080313152341.GB1587@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7)

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:23, dshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:

> I would particulary appreciate comments on the choice of 128 and
> 256-bit keys (that is, lacking 192).  I tend to agree with Jon that

Drop Camellia-192.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.

References:
- More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG
  - From: Derek Atkins
- Re: More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG
  - From: David Shaw
- Re: More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG
  - From: Derek Atkins
- Ready for Camellia? (was: More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG)
  - From: David Shaw

Prev by Date: Re: ECC in OpenPGP proposal, second revision
Previous by thread: Re: Ready for Camellia?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread