Archive of ietf-openpgp, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-openpgp
Page 4 of 55
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Re: Please review OpenPGP part of RFC 2538bis, (continued)
- Four Points.,
Ian Grigg
- Key size suggestions,
David Shaw
- [ISSUE] Elgamal Signature remnants,
David Shaw
- [ISSUE] Call V4 V4,
David Shaw
- [ISSUE] Some capitalization oddities,
David Shaw
- [ISSUE] UTF-8 CRLF,
David Shaw
- last call?,
Ian Grigg
- private key binding clarification,
poiboy
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-11.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Request for Agenda Items for DC IETF,
Derek Atkins
- Status of RFC2440,
Ian Grigg
- Replay attack detection via nonce,
Hasnain Mujtaba
- Signed + Encrypted messages,
Hasnain Mujtaba
- MD5 warning,
David Shaw
- re-consideration of TIGER,
vedaal
- Partial chunking question,
Hasnain Mujtaba
- Re: IETF document publication process tweaks.,
Derek Atkins
- Yet another way to mangle OpenPGP data,
David Shaw
- Bis11 sent out,
Jon Callas
- [ISSUE] UTF8 literal packets proposal,
David Shaw
- Converting mailbody to UTF-8 before encryption?,
Holger Sesterhenn
- Literal packets and canonicalization,
Hasnain Mujtaba
- Whither the 0x40 timestamp signature?,
David Shaw
- "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
David Shaw
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
山本和彦
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Jon Callas
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Will Price
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Ian Grigg
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Ian Grigg
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Jon Callas
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
David Shaw
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Jon Callas
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Len Sassaman
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Brian G. Peterson
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Len Sassaman
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
Len Sassaman
- Re: "Yes, I can handle PGP/MIME",
David Shaw
- Re: [ISSUE] End-of-line whitespace in 0x01 sigs,
iang
- [ISSUE] Signing things that aren't obvious how to hash,
David Shaw
- Re: whitespace // the program,
iang
- whitespace // the 'program',
vedaal
- UTF-8 and literal packets,
Jon Callas
- [ISSUE] A collection of fussy language nits,
David Shaw
- [ISSUE] User attribute language problem,
David Shaw
- AW: Loading FR in CFB mode,
Weins, Thorsten
- suggested text for Public Subkey Packet section,
vedaal
- Loading FR in CFB mode,
Weins, Thorsten
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-10.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Be careful with that axe, Eugene,
Jon Callas
- Removing Elgamal Sigs,
Jon Callas
- bis-10 sent in,
Jon Callas
- [ISSUE] Boilerplate gives wrong affiliation,
Florian Weimer
- List of OpenPGP Issues,
Derek Atkins
- OpenPGP WG minutes from IETF-59,
Derek Atkins
- cleartext signatures - trailing white space - proposal (2),
Ian Grigg
- Re: cleartext signatures - trailing white space - proposal,
Hal Finney
- cleartext signatures - trailing white space - recap,
Ian Grigg
- Re: IDEA in v3-v4 conflict (was Re: OpenPGP at IETF-59 Draft Minutes #1),
vedaal
- Packets sequences,
Hasnain Mujtaba
- OpenPGP at IETF-59 Draft Minutes #1,
Derek Atkins
- RSA conf paper on PGP web of trust,
Hal Finney
- OpenPGP Meeting Summary,
Derek Atkins
- Agenda for OpenPGP Working Group,
Derek Atkins
- Re: Let's resolve the end-of-line and whitespace question,
vedaal
- Archive - missing messages,
Ian Grigg
- SubKey expiration,
Hasnain Mujtaba
- Meeting in Seoul -- call for Agenda Items.,
Derek Atkins
- Trust Packets,
Weins, Thorsten
- Re: Trust Packets,
Werner Koch
- Re: Trust Packets,
Ian Grigg
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Trust Packets,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: Trust Packets,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: Trust Packets,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: Trust Packets,
Peter Gutmann
- RE: Trust Packets,
Peter Gutmann
- RE: Trust Packets,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: Trust Packets,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: Trust Packets,
vedaal
- Minor MDC inconsistency in bis-09,
David Shaw
- New mail-ng mailing list open for sign-ups,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Reason for V4 signature postscript,
Hal Finney
- check for complementary keys,
Hasnain Mujtaba
- The last word (hopefully) on back-signatures,
David Shaw
- cleartext signed messages - UTF-8 - stripping the whitespace,
Ian Grigg
- cleartext signatures - consistent naming,
Ian Grigg
- filenames of encrypted attachments visible ? How hard would it be to hide?,
Ralf Hauser
- Partial length chunks and 5-byte lengths,
David Shaw
- Compression and partial length chunks,
Hasnain Mujtaba
- The signer's user ID subpacket and attribute IDs,
David Shaw
- "Other" compression algorithms,
David Shaw
- From-plus-a-space,
David Shaw
- Valid OpenPGP keys without self-signature?,
aboietf
- armour pierced with PGP 8 arrow,
Ian Grigg
- Removing Elgamal signatures,
Werner Koch
- Re: Non UTF-8 Text in Message Body,
David Shaw
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-09.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: Shamir's Discrete Logarithm Hash,
vedaal
- private key CFB,
Douglas Maus
- Shamir's Discrete Logarithm Hash // for possible inclusion into open-pgp ?,
vedaal
- Let's finish up 0x50 "notary" signatures,
David Shaw
- Back-signatures, part II,
David Shaw
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Michael Young
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
David Shaw
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
David Shaw
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
David Shaw
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Adrian von Bidder
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
David Shaw
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Michael Young
- Re: Back-signatures, part II,
Trevor Perrin
- Back-signatures proposal,
David Shaw
- OpenPGP and IDNA/IMAA,
Marc Mutz
- Meeting in Minneapolis?,
Derek Atkins
- Fwd: RFC 3156, status of RFC 2015,
John W. Noerenberg II
- Non-textual User IDs,
David Shaw
- 3rd-party Signatures in a One-Pass Signed Message,
poiboy
- Using IDEA in v3-v4 algorithm conflict,
David Shaw
- Signature extensions?,
Mark Williams
- Davis paper revisited // separation of signed and encrypted messages into clearsigned messages,
vedaal
- OpenPGP BOF at CRYPTO 2003,
Hironobu SUZUKI
- multiple signature packets,
vedaal
- signature woes and reconciliation, examples appreciated,
poiboy
- Clarification needed on compressed messages,
David Shaw
- Incompatibility between NAI command line and PGP 8.0 keys,
Hal Finney
- Text "attributes",
David Shaw
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
vedaal
- Location of 'key expiration time' signature subpacket,
Edwin Woudt
- Two more items,
David Shaw
- bis-08 notes,
David Shaw
- Two clarifications,
David Shaw
- Adding in BZ2 compression?,
Jon Callas
- Suggestion for the signing subkey problem,
David Shaw
- augmenting subkeys,
Trevor Perrin
- PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Len Sassaman
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Michael Young
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Michael Young
- Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
David Shaw
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
Michael Young
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
David Shaw
Page 4 of 55
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.