Archive of ietf-openpgp, by thread

• Re: Differing algortithms in chains, (continued)
  • Re: Differing algortithms in chains, Lutz Donnerhacke
• CfV: Packet <-> Elements, Lutz Donnerhacke
  • Re: CfV: Packet <-> Elements, John W. Noerenberg
    • Re: CfV: Packet <-> Elements, Lutz Donnerhacke
      • Re: CfV: Packet <-> Elements, John W. Noerenberg
• Re: ASN.1 packet?, William Allen Simpson
  • Re: ASN.1 packet?, Lutz Donnerhacke
• Armor versus MIME versus binary, William Allen Simpson
  • Re: Armor versus MIME versus binary, Lutz Donnerhacke
    • Re: Armor versus MIME versus binary, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: Armor versus MIME versus binary, John W. Noerenberg
    • Re: Armor versus MIME versus binary, Lutz Donnerhacke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Armor versus MIME versus binary, Tom Phinney
  • Re: Armor versus MIME versus binary, Peter Gutmann
    • Re: Armor versus MIME versus binary, Dave Crocker / IMC
      • Re: Armor versus MIME versus binary, Timothy Glenn Stockstill
• draft editor(s), William Allen Simpson
  • Re: draft editor(s), Lutz Donnerhacke
  • Re: draft editor(s), John W. Noerenberg
    • Re: draft editor(s), Adam Back
• What RSA & Netscape have to offer, William H. Geiger III
  • Re: What RSA & Netscape have to offer, Tim May
• World-wide GAK, Jeffrey Gold
  • Re: World-wide GAK, Tim May
    • Re: World-wide GAK, Andrew Bromage
  • Re: World-wide GAK, Salvatore Nesta
• PGP 5.5 CMR key examples, mini-review, Greg Broiles
• CDR design document, Adam Back
  • Re: CDR design document, Jonathan Wienke
    • secret sharing (Re: CDR design document), Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: CDR design document, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
• Changes to the current draft, Lutz Donnerhacke
• encryption key expiry in pgp5.x, Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: encryption key expiry in pgp5.x, Hal Finney
    • Re: encryption key expiry in pgp5.x, Adam Back
  • Re: encryption key expiry in pgp5.x, Hal Finney
    • Re: encryption key expiry in pgp5.x, Adam Back
  • Re: encryption key expiry in pgp5.x, Hal Finney
• New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
  • Re: MIME question about new draft, Ben Escoto
    • Re: MIME question about new draft, Lutz Donnerhacke
  • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
  • Re: New Draft... going forward, Thomas Roessler
    • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Michael Elkins
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Ian Grigg
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Gene Hoffman
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Ian Grigg
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Gene Hoffman
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Gene Hoffman
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Gene Hoffman
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Kent Crispin
      • ASN.1 packet?, Lutz Donnerhacke
      • updating status of keys in public key chain..?, robert . guerra
      • Re: updating status of keys in public key chain..?, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
  • Re: New Draft... going forward, John W. Noerenberg
    • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: New Draft... going forward, Mike Wynn
  • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
    • Re: New Draft... going forward, Ian Grigg
  • Re: New Draft... going forward, Hal Finney
    • Re: New Draft... going forward, Lutz Donnerhacke
• PGP 5.0 Secret Key Formats, Lindsay Mathieson
• what is purpose of CMR?, Adam Back
  • Re: what is purpose of CMR?, Jon Callas
    • Re: what is purpose of CMR?, Adam Back
      • Re: what is purpose of CMR?, Ian Grigg
      • Callas/Grigg CMR variant (was Re: what is purpose of CMR?), Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: what is purpose of CMR?, Anonymous
• Re: Is PGP still private?, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  • Re: Is PGP still private?, Adam Back
    • Re: Is PGP still private?, Jon Callas
      • Re: Is PGP still private?, Adam Back
      • Re: Is PGP still private?, Kent Crispin
      • jurisdictional interactions (Re: Is PGP still private?), Adam Back
      • Re: Is PGP still private?, Andrew Bromage
      • Re: Is PGP still private?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: Is PGP still private?, Toto
      • why we are arguing for more resistant variants (Re: Is PGP still private?), Adam Back
      • Re: why we are arguing for more resistant variants (Re: Is PGP still private?), Kent Crispin
      • Re: why we are arguing for more resistant variants (Re: Is PGP still private?), Adam Back
      • Re: why we are arguing for more resistant variants, Kent Crispin
      • Revealing individual messages., Ian Miller
      • Re: Revealing individual messages., Bill Stewart
      • Re: Revealing individual messages., Ian Miller
  • binding cryptography, Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is PGP still private?, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  • RE: Is PGP still private?, Gaon, David
• KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, Hal Finney
  • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, William H. Geiger III
    • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, Will Price
      • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, Adam Back
  • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, Lutz Donnerhacke
    • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, Lutz Donnerhacke
      • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, Lutz Donnerhacke
      • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, Andrew Bromage
      • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, stewarts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, Tom Phinney
    • Re: KeyIDs and Key Fingerprints, Will Price
• PGP Inc apology deal, Adam Back
  • Re: PGP Inc apology deal, Adam Back
• Secure receipts, Ian Brown
  • Re: Secure receipts, Bonatti Chris
    • Re: Secure receipts, David Formosa
  • Re: Secure receipts, Andrew Bromage
  • Re: Secure receipts, Karen Rosenthal
    • Re: Secure receipts, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Secure receipts, Mike Wynn
    • Is PGP still private?, Roland Silver
      • Re: Is PGP still private?, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: Is PGP still private?, Adam Back
  • Re: Secure receipts, Hal Finney
    • Re: Secure receipts, Ian Brown
  • Re: Secure receipts, Ian Brown
• PGP/MIME test, addendum, Ben Escoto
• PGP/MIME Partial compliance test, Ben Escoto
  • Re: PGP/MIME Partial compliance test, Anthony E. Greene
    • Re: PGP/MIME Partial compliance test, Ben Escoto
• Time to move on, iang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Time to move on, Gaon, David
  • RE: Time to move on, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
• Schneier comment on CMR, Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Schneier comment on CMR, Mike Wynn
  • RE: Schneier comment on CMR, Gaon, David
• [VOTE] comp.security.pgp.test, Dave Del Torto
  • [no subject], robert . guerra
  • Re: [VOTE] comp.security.pgp.test, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [VOTE] comp.security.pgp.test, Joe_Tsai
• commercial data recovery, Zooko Journeyman
  • Re: commercial data recovery, alexlh
  • Re: commercial data recovery, Adam Back
    • Just say "No" to key recovery concerns...keep OpenPGP pure, Tim May
      • Re: Just say "No" to key recovery concerns...keep OpenPGP pure, Rick Smith
      • Re: Just say "No" to key recovery concerns...keep OpenPGP pure, Tim May
  • Re: commercial data recovery, Andrew Bromage
• proposal: commercial data recovery, Adam Back
  • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Bill Frantz
    • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Adam Back
  • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Rick Smith
    • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery [P], Anthony E. Greene
      • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery [P], Marshall Clow
    • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Adam Back
      • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Rick Smith
  • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Will Price
    • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Ian Brown
    • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Richard Johnson
    • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Richard Johnson
    • anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Adam Back
      • Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Gene Hoffman
      • Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Adam Back
      • Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Jon Callas
      • Praise the Lord! / Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, TruthMonger
      • Re: Praise the Lord! / Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Jon Callas
      • PGP Inc apology deal (was Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1), Adam Back
      • PGP Inc apology deal (Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1), Adam Back
      • Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Kent Crispin
      • re. GAK resistant design principles: worked example #1, Adam Back
      • Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Bill Stewart
      • Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Adam Back
      • Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Bill Stewart
      • Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1, Adam Back
    • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, stewarts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Hal Finney
    • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Adam Back
    • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, nospam-seesignature
      • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Jon Callas
      • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Bill Stewart
      • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Adam Back
  • Re: proposal: commercial data recovery, Anonymous Remailer
• PGP Implemention, Lindsay Mathieson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PGP Implemention, William Allen Simpson
  • Re: PGP Implemention, iang
  • Re: PGP Implemention, Lindsay Mathieson
  • Re: PGP Implemention, Lindsay Mathieson
• Politics & PGP, Jeffrey Gold
  • Re: Politics & PGP, Hironobu Suzuki
• negative security aspects of GAK compliance, Adam Back
  • Re: negative security aspects of GAK compliance, Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: negative security aspects of GAK compliance, Hal Finney
    • Re: negative security aspects of GAK compliance, Adam Back
• the case for separate comms keys, Adam Back
  • Re: the case for separate comms keys, Ryan Anderson
    • Re: the case for separate comms keys, Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: the case for separate comms keys, Peter Gutmann
    • Cuz' Me...., Paul Rarey
• new "communication key" semantics & PFS, Adam Back
• r.e. OpenPGP document status, Rodney Thayer
  • Re: r.e. OpenPGP document status, Adam Back
• Why Corporate Message Recovery isn't GAK, Jon Callas
  • Why corporate message recovery IS gak compliant (Re: Why Corporate Message Recovery isn't GAK), Adam Back
• Why Corporate Message Recovery isn't Key Escrow, Jon Callas
  • Why Jon Callas keeps picking nits (Re: Why Corporate Message Recovery isn't Key Escrow), Adam Back
    • Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues (Re: Why Jon Callas keeps picking nits), William H. Geiger III
      • IETF policy on refusing to allow politics to weaken protocols (Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues), Adam Back
      • Re: IETF policy on refusing to allow politics to weaken protocols (Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues), Bill Frantz
      • Re: IETF policy on refusing to allow politics to weaken protocols (Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues), Adam Back
      • Message not available
      • Re: IETF policy on refusing to allow politics to weaken protocols (Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues), Tony Mione
• PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Adam Back
  • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Jon Callas
    • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Andrew Bromage
    • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Adam Back
      • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Adam Back
  • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Ian Miller
    • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Adam Back
      • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Jonathan Seybold
      • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Adam Back
      • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Omegaman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Hal Finney
    • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Adam Back
    • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Ian Brown
      • key use sub-packets / draft EEMA standards, Adam Back
  • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, William Allen Simpson
    • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Ian Brown
      • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Adam Back
  • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Hal Finney
  • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Hal Finney
    • PolicyMaker & GAK compliance, Adam Back
      • Re: PolicyMaker & GAK compliance, Ian Brown
      • Re: PolicyMaker & GAK compliance, Ian Brown
      • Re: PolicyMaker & GAK compliance, William H. Geiger III
    • Signature assertions, Andrew Bromage
      • Re: Signature assertions, Adam Back
  • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, iang
    • Re: Discussion, Will Price
      • Re: Discussion, Ian Brown
      • Re: Discussion, Ian Brown
      • Re: Discussion, Anthony E. Greene
      • Re: Discussion, Ian Brown
      • Re: Discussion, Tim Philp
      • Re: Discussion, Adam Back
  • RE: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
    • Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard, Ian Brown
• Key Escrow Issues, Jeffrey Gold
  • Re: Key Escrow Issues, Lutz Donnerhacke
  • Re: Key Escrow Issues, Ian Brown
    • Re: Key Escrow Issues, William H. Geiger III
• Announce: Mapil v0.0 PGP mail utility, Ben Escoto
  • Re: Announce: Mapil v0.0 PGP mail utility, John W. Noerenberg
• Key quorum, Andrew Bromage
• Fwd: WG Action: An Open Specification for Pretty Good Privacy (openpgp), John W. Noerenberg
• [no subject], Charles Breed
  • Re:, Peter Williams
• recent article, Charles Breed
  • Re: recent article, Bill Sommerfeld
    • Re: recent article, Charles Breed
      • Re: recent article, Bill Sommerfeld
      • Re: recent article, Dave Crocker / IMC
• Working Group announcement, Charles Breed
• non-transferable signatures, Adam Back
• stego support, Adam Back
  • Re: stego support, Bill Frantz
• Charter submitted to IESG, John W. Noerenberg
  • Re: Charter submitted to IESG, William H. Geiger III
  • Message not available
    • Re: Charter submitted to IESG, Tony Mione
      • Re: Charter submitted to IESG, John W. Noerenberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Charter submitted to IESG, iang
  • Re: Charter submitted to IESG, Lindsay Mathieson
• Change Control, Charles Breed
• An added E-Mail Issue, William H. Geiger III
  • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, tzeruch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, William H. Geiger III
    • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, Jon Callas
      • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, tzeruch
  • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, Hal Finney
    • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, Bill Frantz
  • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, Hal Finney
  • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, Hal Finney
    • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, Dan Geer
      • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, Dan Geer
      • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, Anthony E. Greene
  • Re: An added E-Mail Issue, Hal Finney
• Principles and Principals, William Allen Simpson
  • Re: Principles and Principals, Ian Brown
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Bonatti Chris
      • Re: Principles and Principals, Ian Brown
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Patrick Richard
      • Re: Principles and Principals, Bonatti Chris
      • Re: Principles and Principals, Patrick Richard
      • Re: Principles and Principals, Jon Callas
      • Re: Principles and Principals, Patrick Richard
      • Re: Principles and Principals, Jon Callas
      • Re: Principles and Principals, Pat Richard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Principles and Principals, Rodney Thayer
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Jon Callas
  • Re: Principles and Principals, William H. Geiger III
    • Re: Principles and Principals, tzeruch
  • Re: Principles and Principals, David P. Kemp
  • RE: Principles and Principals, Rik Drummond
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Ian Brown
      • Re: Principles and Principals, Bonatti Chris
  • RE: Principles and Principals, Rik Drummond
  • RE: Principles and Principals, Hal Finney
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Ian Brown
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Ian Brown
  • Re: Principles and Principals, William Allen Simpson
  • Re: Principles and Principals, William Allen Simpson
  • Re: Principles and Principals, William H. Geiger III
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Pat Richard
  • Re: Principles and Principals, David P. Kemp
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Ian Brown
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Bonatti Chris
  • Re: Principles and Principals, David P. Kemp
    • Re: Principles and Principals, Bill Frantz
  • Re: Principles and Principals, David P. Kemp
• Re: Elgamal != DH (was Re: The purpose of this mailing list), Hal Finney
  • Re: Elgamal != DH, Bodo Moeller
• X.509 and PGP (was: The purpose of this mailing list), Hal Finney
  • Re: X.509 and PGP (was: The purpose of this mailing list), nospam-seesignature
• While on the subject of standards, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: While on the subject of standards, Lindsay Mathieson
    • Re: While on the subject of standards, robert . guerra
• handling of different encryption methods..?, robert.guerra
  • Re: handling of different encryption methods..?, William H. Geiger III
• RE: The purpose of this mailing list, Steven Tay Beng Kuan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The purpose of this mailing list, Rodney Thayer
  • The purpose of this mailing list, Rodney Thayer
    • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Ian Brown
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Bonatti Chris
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, tzeruch
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Charles Breed
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Ian Brown
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Jon Callas
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, tzeruch
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Marc Horowitz
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Jon Callas
      • Message not available
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Jon Callas
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, tzeruch
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Ian Brown
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, William Allen Simpson
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Marla Pereira
    • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Bonatti Chris
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, iang
    • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Charles Breed
      • Elgamal != DH (was Re: The purpose of this mailing list), Adam Back
    • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Bonatti Chris
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Peter Gutmann
    • Converting X.509 and PGP certs, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Charles Breed
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Hal Finney
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, David P. Kemp
  • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, William H. Geiger III
    • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Marc Horowitz
• PGP API, Lindsay Mathieson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PGP API, Lindsay Mathieson
  • Re: PGP API, Lindsay Mathieson
    • Re: PGP API, William H. Geiger III
  • RE: PGP API, Vinnie Moscaritolo
• [Off-topic] Re: key server lookup protocol?, Peter Gutmann
• key server lookup protocol?, Rodney Thayer
  • Re: key server lookup protocol?, C. Harald Koch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Frank Brueckner
    • Re: key server lookup protocol?, david d `zoo' zuhn
    • Re: key server lookup protocol?, C. Harald Koch
      • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Jon Callas
      • The purpose of this mailing list, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: The purpose of this mailing list, Jon Callas
      • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Frank Brueckner
      • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Pat Richard
    • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Anthony E. Greene
  • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Rodney Thayer
    • Re: key server lookup protocol?, tzeruch
      • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Alan Batie
    • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Marc Horowitz
    • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Anthony E. Greene
  • Re: key server lookup protocol?, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
    • Re: key server lookup protocol?, david d `zoo' zuhn
  • Re: key server lookup protocol?, Rodney Thayer
    • Re: key server lookup protocol?, William H. Geiger III
• UserID/Auth Field in Open-PGP certs, Charles Breed
  • Re: UserID/Auth Field in Open-PGP certs, Assar Westerlund
    • Re: UserID/Auth Field in Open-PGP certs, Charles Breed
  • Re: UserID/Auth Field in Open-PGP certs, William H. Geiger III
    • Re: UserID/Auth Field in Open-PGP certs, Charles Breed
      • Re: UserID/Auth Field in Open-PGP certs, William H. Geiger III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: UserID/Auth Field in Open-PGP certs, William Allen Simpson
    • Re: UserID/Auth Field in Open-PGP certs, Ian Brown
• Re: mandatory requirements, Hagen Wollert
• Re:, William Allen Simpson
• [no subject], David Gaon
  • Re:, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: Open-PGP Charter, Anthony E. Greene
• ASCII box diagrams, William Allen Simpson
• content tag, William Allen Simpson
• PROPOSED OPEN-PGP Charter, Charles Breed
  • PGP specification note and suggestion, tzeruch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: PROPOSED OPEN-PGP Charter, Charles Breed
  • RE: PROPOSED OPEN-PGP Charter, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
    • RE: PROPOSED OPEN-PGP Charter, Charles Breed
    • RE: PROPOSED OPEN-PGP Charter, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}
  • Re: RE: PROPOSED OPEN-PGP Charter, William Allen Simpson
  • Re: PROPOSED OPEN-PGP Charter, William Allen Simpson
  • RE: PROPOSED OPEN-PGP Charter, David Gaon
• Comments on draft-ietf-pgp-formats00.txt, Tony Mione
  • Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pgp-formats00.txt, Jon Callas
• BOF at IETF, Rodney Thayer
• Re: algorithm ID encodings & terminol., Jason Dufair
• [Fwd: [PGP-USERS] PGP 5.0i is now available ... !], Robert Guerra
• comments on message exchange draft [not encodings!], Rodney Thayer
• purpose: evolution or revolution, William Allen Simpson
• Re: extensibility & code bloat (Re: PGP cipher tags), Peter Gutmann
  • Re: extensibility & code bloat (Re: PGP cipher tags), Jonathan Wienke
  • Re: extensibility & code bloat (Re: PGP cipher tags), Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: extensibility & code bloat (Re: PGP cipher tags), A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
    • Re: extensibility & code bloat (Re: PGP cipher tags), tzeruch
  • Re: extensibility & code bloat (Re: PGP cipher tags), nospam-seesignature
• Modular algorithms in PGP 5.0 (was Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft), Derek Atkins
• Re: terminology, William Allen Simpson
• content tag, format, terminology, William Allen Simpson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: content tag, format, terminology, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  • RE: content tag, format, terminology, Noah Salzman
    • RE: content tag, format, terminology, Jon Callas
  • RE: content tag, format, terminology, Peter Gutmann
• Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats draft-ietf-pgp-formats00.txt, Gerald Young
• PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, jude shabry
  • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Hironobu Suzuki
    • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Jon Callas
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Jonathan Wienke
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Adam Shostack
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Marshall Clow
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, tzeruch
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Jurgen Botz
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, tzeruch
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Jon Callas
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, tzeruch
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, tzeruch
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, tzeruch
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Assar Westerlund
      • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Cees de Groot
      • algorithm ID encodings & terminology (was Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft), Adam Back
      • Re: algorithm ID encodings & terminology (was Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft), Jon Callas
      • Re: algorithm ID encodings & terminology (was Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft), nospam-seesignature
      • Re: algorithm ID encodings & terminology (was Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft), Mark Grant
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, W Lewis
  • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Johnny Eriksson
    • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Ian Sparkes
  • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Hagen Wollert
  • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Rich Salz
    • PGP cipher tags, Assar Westerlund
      • extensibility & code bloat (Re: PGP cipher tags), Adam Back
      • Re: extensibility & code bloat (Re: PGP cipher tags), brianh
      • Re: extensibility & code bloat (Re: PGP cipher tags), tzeruch
  • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Hagen Wollert
    • Re: PGP Message Exchange Formats Internet Draft, Felix Lee
• digest mode, Tay Beng Kuan Steven
• Key search, Ben Cox
  • Re: Key search, Charles Breed
    • Re: Key search, Ben Cox
    • Subject line, Steve Schear
      • Re: Subject line, William H. Geiger III
      • Re: Subject line, Charles Breed
  • Re: Key search, Wolfgang Ley
    • Re: Key search, Steve Schear
• IETF "Open-PGP" Birds of a Feather, Charles Breed

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.