Archive of ietf-openpgp, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-openpgp
Page 5 of 59
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?), (continued)
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
David Shaw
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
Len Sassaman
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
David Shaw
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
Len Sassaman
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
David Shaw
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
Imad R. Faiad
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
David Shaw
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
Jon Callas
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
David Shaw
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?),
Jon Callas
- Re: Requiring self-signed uids? (was Re: PoP & Signer's User IDsubpacket?),
Michael Young
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Michael Young
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Len Sassaman
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Hal Finney
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Derek Atkins
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Derek Atkins
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Derek Atkins
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Derek Atkins
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Jon Callas
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Derek Atkins
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Imad R. Faiad
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
David Shaw
- Re: PoP & Signer's User ID subpacket?,
Hal Finney
- Using all zeros for IV means that..,
Mauricio Junqueira
- key flag for authentication,
Werner Koch
- Re: key flag for authentication,
Ian Grigg
- Re: key flag for authentication,
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Imad R. Faiad
- RE: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Ian Brown
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys,
Werner Koch
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Imad R. Faiad
- RE: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Ian Brown
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Imad R. Faiad
- RE: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Richard Laager
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys,
Werner Koch
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Derek Atkins
- RE: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Ian Brown
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Derek Atkins
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Adam Back
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Imad R. Faiad
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys,
Werner Koch
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys,
Imad R. Faiad
- Re: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Imad R. Faiad
- RE: OpenPGP Sub Keys (Was: key flag for authentication),
Ian Brown
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-08.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Bis-08 submitted,
Jon Callas
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
Steven M. Bellovin
- Suggested DER Prefixes,
Imad R. Faiad
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Jon Callas
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Imad R. Faiad
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Jon Callas
- RE: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Richard Laager
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Derek Atkins
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Derek Atkins
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Jeroen van Gelderen
- AES-128 (was Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
Mike Markowitz
- AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
Adam Back
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
Derek Atkins
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
Adam Back
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
John Wilkinson
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
Hironobu SUZUKI
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128,
Werner Koch
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128,
Bodo Moeller
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128,
John Wilkinson
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128,
Ian Grigg
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128,
John Wilkinson
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128,
Jon Callas
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128,
David Shaw
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128,
Mike Markowitz
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
Jon Callas
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
Adam Back
- Re: AES-256 vs AES-128 (Re: Suggested DER Prefixes),
David Shaw
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Jon Callas
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Suggested DER Prefixes,
Peter Gutmann
- OpenPGP Administrivia,
Derek Atkins
- new chair,
Steve Bellovin
- Low-level question about OpenPGP - why CFB mode?,
john . dlugosz
- Signature targets and where they should be used,
David Shaw
- partial packet lengths in PGP 8,
Brian Smith
- Please Help with OpenPGP's CFB Mode,
Daniel Fabian
- gnupg/pgp symmetric encryption incompatibility report,
vedaal
- Notary sigs again,
David Shaw
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-DACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Peter Gutmann
- What's the consensus?,
Jon Callas
- I-D ACTION:draft-shaw-openpgp-hkp-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- OpenPGP.org and GnuPG,
pplf
- Finalizing notary signatures,
David Shaw
- Subpacket clarification,
David Shaw
- Dash escaping consensus?,
Jon Callas
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Michael H. Warfield
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Jeroen van Gelderen
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Derek Atkins
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Jeroen van Gelderen
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
David Shaw
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Jeroen van Gelderen
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
David Shaw
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Jon Callas
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
David Shaw
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Derek Atkins
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
David Shaw
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Adam Back
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Adam Back
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Derek Atkins
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Jeroen van Gelderen
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Derek Atkins
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Jon Callas
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Mike Markowitz
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Jon Callas
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Ian Grigg
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Peter Gutmann
- Minor clarification for fingerprint calculation,
David Shaw
- Minor typo change,
David Shaw
- Re: meeting in San Francisco? (v3 keys // IDEA),
vedaal
- informal meeting in san francisco,
Rodney Thayer
- Settling the TIGER question,
David Shaw
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt,
Bodo Moeller
- Hard expiration dates (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
David Shaw
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Bodo Moeller
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
David Shaw
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Jon Callas
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-DACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Michael Young
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-DACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Jon Callas
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was:I-DACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Michael Young
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-DACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Bodo Moeller
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
David Shaw
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Bodo Moeller
- Re: Hard expiration dates (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-07.txt),
Mike Markowitz
- Bis-07 submitted,
Jon Callas
- meeting in San Francisco?,
Rodney Thayer
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Derek Atkins
- Message not available
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Rodney Thayer
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Derek Atkins
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Jon Callas
- HKP (was Re: meeting in San Francisco?),
David Shaw
- Deprecating old keys (was Re: meeting in San Francisco?),
David Shaw
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Werner Koch
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Jon Callas
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Len Sassaman
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Derek Atkins
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Len Sassaman
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Adam Back
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Bodo Moeller
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Jon Callas
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Bodo Moeller
- Re: meeting in San Francisco?,
Len Sassaman
- v4-only keyanalyze (was Re: meeting in San Francisco?),
Jason Harris
- Re: v4-only keyanalyze,
Werner Koch
- Re: v4-only keyanalyze,
Jon Callas
- Re: v4-only keyanalyze,
Bodo Moeller
- Further deprecating PGP2 (was: Re: meeting in San Francisco?),
Michael Young
- Re: Further deprecating PGP2,
Werner Koch
- Obituary for Janis Jagars (Disastry),
Len Sassaman
- How about this? (Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?),
john . dlugosz
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
maf
- Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Thomas Roessler
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
ned . freed
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Michael Young
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
ned . freed
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Thomas Roessler
- let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Thomas Roessler
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Michael Young
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Bill Frantz
- RE: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Richard Laager
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Simon Josefsson
- RE: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Richard Laager
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
David Shaw
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Michael Young
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
David Shaw
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Michael Young
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
ned . freed
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Len Sassaman
- Re: let's look... Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Marc Mutz
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
ned . freed
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Michael Young
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Marc Mutz
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Greg Troxel
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
Jon Callas
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Standardizing inline PGP for e-mail?,
john . dlugosz
- Diffie-Hellman key agreement,
Timo Schulz
- about cast cfb64,
jfguo
- Note Well Statement,
The IESG
- Reference for "IETF name space"?,
Michael Young
- acceptable comment lines in between pgp header and message block,
vedaal
- ASN.1 OID for TIGER/192,
David Shaw
- security fixes (KDF, MDC->MAC)?,
Trevor Perrin
- Re: Why ECC?,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Bodo Moeller
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Jon Callas
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Bodo Moeller
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Derek Atkins
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Bodo Moeller
- RE: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Richie Laager
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Bodo Moeller
- RE: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Richie Laager
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Bodo Moeller
- RE: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Richie Laager
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Len Sassaman
- More on key expiration policy (Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt),
Michael Young
- Re: More on key expiration policy (Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt),
Len Sassaman
- Re: More on key expiration policy (Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt),
Bodo Moeller
- Re: More on key expiration policy (Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt),
Bodo Moeller
- Re: More on key expiration policy (Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt),
David Shaw
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Jon Callas
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Bodo Moeller
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Derek Atkins
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Bodo Moeller
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Adrian von Bidder
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Michael Young
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Len Sassaman
- Expiration semantics (Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt),
Michael Young
- Re: Expiration semantics (Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt),
Bodo Moeller
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
disastry
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Michael Young
- Re: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Bodo Moeller
Fixing the MDC language,
Jon Callas
RE: [Cfrg] OpenPGP security analysis,
Trevor Perrin
S/MIME vulnerability,
Hal Finney
Nomcom call for volunteers,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
RFC: DSA key lengths; Elgamal type 16 v. type 20,
Brian M. Carlson
possible new type of pgp plaintext attack ?,
vedaal
CFP - Symposium on Network & Distributed Systems Security,
Clifford Neuman
Notary signature implementation notes,
David Shaw
Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"?,
john . dlugosz
Primary subkey subpacket,
Timo Schulz
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
I-D ACTION:draft-josefsson-cert-openpgp-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
Question about MDC Packets,
Len Sassaman
Is PGP Freeware v6.5.8 compatible with Windows XP?,
g kare
draft-ietf-tls-openpgp-keys,
Nikos Mavroyanopoulos
photo support?,
Simon Josefsson
check out Islam Exposed.com at http://islamexposed.com,
Bryan Morris
Secret Key Packet Formats,
山本和彦
Mailing List metaissue,
john . dlugosz
RE: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted P GP message is useless,
Terje Braaten
secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: secure sign & encrypt,
Hal Finney
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Hal Finney
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- Re: secure sign & encrypt,
Peter Gutmann
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Dominikus Scherkl
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
- RE: secure sign & encrypt,
Terje Braaten
Page 5 of 59
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.