Archive of ietf-openpgp, by thread

Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-openpgp

Page 51 of 55
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

x04-004 toner, (continued)
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
- x04-004 toner, admin
OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7, John W. Noerenberg
- Re: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7, $B;3K\OBI'(B
  - Revising RFC 2015 (was: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7), Thomas Roessler
    - Re: Revising RFC 2015 (was: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7), $B;3K\OBI'(B
    - Re: Revising RFC 2015 (was: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7), Thomas Roessler
    - Re: Revising RFC 2015 (was: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7), Michael Elkins
  - Re: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7, $B;3K\OBI'(B
    - Re: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7, Thomas Roessler
    - Re: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: OpenPGP agenda for Dec 7, $B;3K\OBI'(B
typo in RFC2440, $B;3K\OBI'(B
Semantics of having multiple encrypted data packets, Andrea Halter
- Re: Semantics of having multiple encrypted data packets, Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: Semantics of having multiple encrypted data packets, Jon Callas
open-pgp / s/mime interoperability, Adam Back
- Re: OpenPGP / S/MIME Interoperability, Frank Brueckner
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: open-pgp / s/mime interoperability, Peter Gutmann
  - Re: open-pgp / s/mime interoperability, Adam Back
- Re: open-pgp / s/mime interoperability, Peter Gutmann
I-D ACTION:draft-moscaritolo-mione-pgpticket-01.txt (resend), Internet-Drafts
Fwd: RFC 2440 on OpenPGP Message Format, John W. Noerenberg
ISM Corp has acquired 4.7 mill to begin production Stock up 100 percent, scj2
PCS CELL PHONE & 2000 GATEWAY 333 MHZ COMPUTERS!!! ALL FOR THE ASKING !!, COMPUCELL
Protocol Action: OpenPGP Message Format to Proposed Standard, The IESG
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Protocol Action: OpenPGP Message Format to Proposed Standard, John W. Noerenberg
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-08.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-08.txt, Ulf M�ller
suffix for PGP exported key, $B;3K\OBI'(B
- Re: suffix for PGP exported key, Jon Callas
  - Re: suffix for PGP exported key, $B;3K\OBI'(B
    - Re: suffix for PGP exported key, Jon Callas
NDSS '99 Registration Now Taking Place!!, David M. Balenson
IESG action on openpgp-format, John W. Noerenberg
- Re: IESG action on openpgp-format, Bill Frantz
- Re: IESG action on openpgp-format, Jon Callas
  - Re: IESG action on openpgp-format, Jon Callas
FREE CELL PHONES AND NO BILLS!, FRIENDS
Packet Tag 17 ?, Christoph Moser
- Re: Packet Tag 17 ?, Werner Koch
Re: Server decryption / signing (was RE: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages), Bob Jueneman
critical bit (5.2.3.1), Werner Koch
- Re: critical bit (5.2.3.1), Jon Callas
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: critical bit (5.2.3.1), Hal Finney
  - Re: critical bit (5.2.3.1), Werner Koch
  - RE: critical bit (5.2.3.1), Tim Dierks
- Re: critical bit (5.2.3.1), Hal Finney
error in draft 07, section 5.1 ?, Werner Koch
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: error in draft 07, section 5.1 ?, Hal Finney
  - Re: error in draft 07, section 5.1 ?, Ian BROWN
    - Re: error in draft 07, section 5.1 ?, Jon Callas
Re: Server decryption / signing (was RE: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages), William Ottaway
Re: Server decryption / signing (was RE: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages), William Ottaway
- Re: Server decryption / signing (was RE: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages), Adam Back
Server decryption / signing (was RE: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages), Blake Ramsdell
- Re: Server decryption / signing (was RE: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages), William H. Geiger III
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Server decryption / signing (was RE: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages), mark
  - Re: Server decryption / signing (was RE: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages), Adam Back
Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Ian Bell
- Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Ned Freed
  - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Ian Bell
- Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, $B;3K\OBI'(B
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Lindsay Mathieson
  - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Ian Bell
- Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Hal Finney
  - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Ned Freed
    - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Bart Schaefer
    - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, John W. Noerenberg
    - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Bart Schaefer
    - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Ned Freed
  - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Steve Hole
    - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, William H. Geiger III
- Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Tom Phinney
- Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Graham Klyne
  - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Ned Freed
- Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Graham Klyne
  - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Ned Freed
    - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Encrypting RFC822 headers in S/MIME or PGP/MIME messages, Ned Freed
Documentation of PGP 2.6.x and PGP 5.x Keyring File Format, Thorsten Maly
- Re: Documentation of PGP 2.6.x and PGP 5.x Keyring File Format, dontspam-tzeruch
Last Call: OpenPGP Message Format to Proposed Standard, The IESG
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Last Call: OpenPGP Message Format to Proposed Standard, The IESG
  - Re: Last Call: OpenPGP Message Format to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  - Re: Last Call: OpenPGP Message Format to Proposed Standard, David Shaw
OT: KRAP is at it in the IETF, William H. Geiger III
New packets in PGP 6.0, Patrick Feisthammel
- Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, William H. Geiger III
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, William Allen Simpson
  - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Jon Callas
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Werner Koch
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Thomas Roessler
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Werner Koch
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Paul Koning
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Jack Repenning
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Paul Koning
- Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Hal Finney
  - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, William H. Geiger III
  - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, dontspam-tzeruch
    - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Jack Repenning
- Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, Hal Finney
  - Re: New packets in PGP 6.0, William H. Geiger III
Watch for IETF Last Call, John W. Noerenberg
Revising RFC 2015, Thomas Roessler
- Re: Revising RFC 2015, $B;3K\OBI'(B
  - Re: Revising RFC 2015, Thomas Roessler
    - Re: Revising RFC 2015, $B;3K\OBI'(B
    - Re: Revising RFC 2015, Thomas Roessler
    - the protocol parameter, $B;3K\OBI'(B
    - the micalg parameter, $B;3K\OBI'(B
    - Re: the micalg parameter, Thomas Roessler
    - Re: the micalg parameter, $B;3K\OBI'(B
    - Re: Revising RFC 2015, Steve Hole
    - Re: Revising RFC 2015, $B;3K\OBI'(B
  - Re: Revising RFC 2015, William H. Geiger III
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Revising RFC 2015, Lindsay Mathieson
  - Re: Revising RFC 2015, Thomas Roessler
Request for updates or new submissions to the PGP implemtation web page, Tony Mione
Call for Laundry List, Tony Mione
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
language tag, $B;3K\OBI'(B
- Re: language tag, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  - Re: language tag, Jon Callas
    - Re: language tag, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    - Re: language tag, Jon Callas
    - Re: language tag, Paul Koning
    - Re: language tag, John W. Noerenberg
    - Re: language tag, $B;3K\OBI'(B
  - Re: language tag, $B;3K\OBI'(B
ACM Comp. and Comm. Security: Reg-n Form and Call for Participation, Gene Tsudik
comments on the format 06 draft, $B;3K\OBI'(B
- Re: comments on the format 06 draft, Ulf M�ller
  - Re: comments on the format 06 draft, tzeruch
  - Re: comments on the format 06 draft, Jon Callas
[no subject], ted rallis
[no subject], ted rallis
42nd IETF OpenPGP agenda, John W. Noerenberg
Bug: Public-Key Encrypted Session Key Packets?, Ian Brown
- Re: Bug: Public-Key Encrypted Session Key Packets?, Ulf M�ller
- Re: Bug: Public-Key Encrypted Session Key Packets?, Ulf M�ller
  - error in draft 07, section 5.2.1, Ulf M�ller
August, Jack
[ANN] PowerMail 2.0.3 Mac OS now available, CTM PowerMail announcements
Interesting Webpage on RSA patent, William H. Geiger III
DSA patent, Ulf M�ller
- Re: DSA patent, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  - Re: DSA patent, William H. Geiger III
  - Re: DSA patent (more on RSADSI), William H. Geiger III
    - Re: DSA patent (more on RSADSI), Paul Hoffman / IMC
    - Re: DSA patent (more on RSADSI), Ulf M�ller
    - Re: DSA patent (more on RSADSI), Paul Hoffman / IMC
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DSA patent, Anonymous
Another RFC reference note., William H. Geiger III
Minor Note on Draft, William H. Geiger III
Public Key Ring, Christoph Moser
- Re: Public Key Ring, Cypherlist-watch-owner
  - Re: Public Key Ring, William H. Geiger III
Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Hal Finney
- Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Black Unicorn
- Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), William H. Geiger III
  - Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Thomas Roessler
    - Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Thomas Roessler
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Ian Brown
  - Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), dontspam-tzeruch
- Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Ian Brown
- Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Tony L. Svanstrom
  - Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), William H. Geiger III
- Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Tony L. Svanstrom
- Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Ian Brown
Public Keyring, Christoph Moser
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Public Keyring, Hal Finney
  - Re: Public Keyring, Christoph Moser
    - Re: Public Keyring, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Public Keyring, dontspam-tzeruch
One-pass signatures, Andrew Bromage
- Re: One-pass signatures, dontspam-tzeruch
  - Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Black Unicorn
    - Re: Shortcomings of current schemes (Was: One-pass signatures), Cypherlist-watch-owner

Page 51 of 55
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.