Archive of ietf-openpgp, by thread

Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-openpgp

Page 53 of 55
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Are You Happy!, vE0RQ1lEW
SPKI in OpenPGP format, Vinnie Moscaritolo
- Re: SPKI in OpenPGP format, Carl Ellison
  - Re: SPKI in OpenPGP format, Vinnie Moscaritolo
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SPKI in OpenPGP format, William Allen Simpson
- Re: SPKI in OpenPGP format, Vinnie Moscaritolo
Please Fix, William H. Geiger III
The canonical <CR><LF> in rfc2015, Hiroyuki Yamada
- Re: The canonical <CR><LF> in rfc2015, Bill Stewart
  - Re: The canonical <CR><LF> in rfc2015, William H. Geiger III
proposed FP sig subpacket type, Vinnie Moscaritolo
- Re: proposed FP sig subpacket type, Lutz Donnerhacke
OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, John W. Noerenberg
- Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Hironobu Suzuki
  - Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Ulf Möller
    - Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Hironobu Suzuki
    - Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, William H. Geiger III
    - MISTY1, Hironobu Suzuki
- Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, nospam-seesignature
- Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Ian BROWN
  - Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Bill Stewart
    - Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Ian Brown
    - Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Ryan Anderson
    - Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Ian BROWN
    - proposed edit (Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes), Adam Back
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes, Hal Finney
CyberNews, Il207y3z3
Lost Messages, William H. Geiger III
Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, Hal Finney
message integrity checksum?, Adam Back
- Re: message integrity checksum?, Gary Howland
- Re: message integrity checksum?, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}
  - Re: message integrity checksum?, Adam Back
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: message integrity checksum?, Adam Back
Key Extraction odd behavior ???, William H. Geiger III
- Re: Key Extraction odd behavior ???, William H. Geiger III
  - Re: Key Extraction odd behavior ???, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Key Extraction odd behavior ???, Patrick Feisthammel
    - Re: Key Extraction odd behavior ???, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Key Extraction odd behavior ???, Patrick Feisthammel
    - Re: Key Extraction odd behavior ??? [Solved], William H. Geiger III
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Key Extraction odd behavior ???, Hal Finney
  - Re: Key Extraction odd behavior ???, William H. Geiger III
section 4.3, William H. Geiger III
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: section 4.3, Hal Finney
  - Re: section 4.3, William H. Geiger III
- Re: section 4.3, Hal Finney
  - Re: section 4.3, William H. Geiger III
  - OpenPGP IETF meeting -- what happened? (Re: section 4.3), Adam Back
    - Re: OpenPGP IETF meeting -- what happened? (Re: section 4.3), Bill Stewart
Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
  - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Tom Weinstein
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Tom Weinstein
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Ben Laurie
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Anthony E. Greene
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Ned Freed
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
  - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Tom Weinstein
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Jeff Williams
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
  - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Anthony E. Greene
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Jeff Williams
    - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
  - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Adam Back
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  - Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Curtis Yarvin
G10: The Free PGP Replacement, Robert Guerra
Where is the symmetric algorithm defined?, Lutz Donnerhacke
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Where is the symmetric algorithm defined?, Hal Finney
  - Re: Where is the symmetric algorithm defined?, Lutz Donnerhacke
Improving resistance against attacks, Patrick Feisthammel
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Improving resistance against attacks, Myron Lewis
- Re: Improving resistance against attacks, Rich Ankney
Re: Possible attack on remailer keys?, Bill Stewart
Re: Handling 8-bit cleartext signatures - a proposal (Was: Re: O, Maksim Otstavnov
PGP 5 (i, source) question..., Rodney Thayer
- Re: PGP 5 (i, source) question..., Tony Mione
- Re: PGP 5 (i, source) question..., William H. Geiger III
DSA and patents, Werner Koch
- Re: DSA and patents, Jon Callas
  - Re: DSA and patents, Werner Koch
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DSA and patents, Peter Gutmann
co-chair resigns, Charles Breed
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: co-chair resigns, Lindsay Mathieson
r.e. code fragments in the documents, Rodney Thayer
We bulk Email for You, 6vc8eqq93
PGP Inc. cleans off the KRAP, Peter Gutmann
Lasers/Optics/Optical Tables - Save!, H1CAK5mNb
More draft comments, Tony Mione
- Re: More draft comments, Lutz Donnerhacke
Re: DSS lengths, Peter Gutmann
Discrete log signature key sizes, Hal Finney
- Re: Discrete log signature key sizes, nospam-seesignature
Fingerprints once again..., Thomas Roessler
OP and pgp5.0i: some problems, Maksim Otstavnov
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OP and pgp5.0i: some problems, Hal Finney
  - Re: OP and pgp5.0i: some problems, Maksim Otstavnov
    - Re: OP and pgp5.0i: some problems, Ian Brown
    - Re: OP and pgp5.0i: some problems, Maksim Otstavnov
    - Re: OP and pgp5.0i: some problems, Ian Brown
    - Re: OP and pgp5.0i: some problems, Maksim Otstavnov
    - Re: OP and pgp5.0i: some problems, Jon Callas
    - Handling 8-bit cleartext signatures - a proposal (Was: Re: OP an, Maksim Otstavnov
    - Re: Handling 8-bit cleartext signatures - a proposal (Was: Re: OP an, Lutz Donnerhacke
    - Re: Handling 8-bit cleartext signatures - a proposal (Was: Re: O, Maksim Otstavnov
  - Re: OP and pgp5.0i: some problems, Lutz Donnerhacke
Comments on current draft, Tony Mione
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comments on current draft, Hal Finney
PGP Implementor's survey : First results snapshot available, Tony Mione
Comments on draft - Long., Bill Stewart
- Re: Comments on draft - Long., stewarts
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comments on draft - Long., Hal Finney
  - Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, Ian Grigg
    - Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, Black Unicorn
    - Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, Jonathan Wienke
    - Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, Black Unicorn
    - Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, stewarts
    - Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, Ian Grigg
    - Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, Bill Stewart
    - Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes, Andrew Bromage
  - Re: Comments on draft - Long., Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: Comments on draft - Long., Peter Gutmann
  - Re: Comments on draft - Long., Bill Stewart
    - DSS lengths, Jon Callas
  - Re: Comments on draft - Long., William H. Geiger III
- Re: Comments on draft - Long., Peter Gutmann
- Re: Comments on draft - Long., Peter Gutmann
- Re: Comments on draft - Long., Hal Finney
What is going on?!?, William H. Geiger III
- Re: What is going on?!? (FROM The CHAIR), John W. Noerenberg
  - Agenda for Monday's WG meeting, John W. Noerenberg
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What is going on?!?, Tony Mione
  - Re: What is going on?!?, David Sternlight
new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Hironobu Suzuki
- Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., stewarts
- Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Jon Callas
  - Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Ian Grigg
  - Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Hironobu Suzuki
    - Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Jon Callas
    - Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Robert Guerra
    - Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Jon Callas
    - Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Ian Grigg
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Hal
- Re: new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem., Peter Gutmann
rhetoric, James Howard
Sternlight, Secret Squirrel
[LISTBIZ] A Point of Order, Dave Del Torto
- Re: [LISTBIZ] A Point of Order, David Sternlight
  - Re: [LISTBIZ] A Point of Order, William H. Geiger III
David, are you listening?, James Howard
- Re: David, are you listening?, David Sternlight
[no subject], Anonymous
25 Million S/MIME Users, Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: 25 Million S/MIME Users, David Sternlight
David, get stuffed., James Howard
- Re: David, get stuffed., David Sternlight
  - Let it die (was: Re: David, get stuffed.), Chris Liljenstolpe
Helpful, Mix
- Re: Helpful, Black Unicorn
- Re: Helpful, David Sternlight
test56, Raviv
Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Steve Crocker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Colin Robbins
  - Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, James M Galvin
Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Steve Crocker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Graham Klyne
Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Gunther Schadow
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, David Sternlight
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Steve Crocker
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Gunther Schadow
  - Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, David Sternlight
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Phillip M Hallam-Baker
  - Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, David Sternlight
    - Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Antonio Mana Gomez
    - Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, David Sternlight
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Alain Zahm
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Sandy Murphy
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, David P. Kemp
PGP/MIME is not an alternative to ascii armor, Hal Finney
Re: The Web of Trust Has No Clothes, David Sternlight
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: The Web of Trust Has No Clothes, Mark J. McArdle
  - Re: The Web of Trust Has No Clothes, David Sternlight
    - Re: The Web of Trust Has No Clothes, David Sternlight
Long term contracts, Ian Grigg
- Re: Long term contracts, Dave Crocker / IMC
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Long term contracts, Lindsay Mathieson
Re: PGP/MIME2, Lindsay Mathieson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PGP/MIME2, Lindsay Mathieson
Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Hal Finney
- PGP/MIME2, Ian Brown
  - Re: PGP/MIME2, $B;3K\OBI'(B
    - Re: PGP/MIME2, Ian Brown
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Hal Finney
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Hal Finney
  - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ned Freed
    - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Erik Seaberg
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Hal Finney
  - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ian Brown
PGP, MIME, and Armour, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
Critical bit (was: case for removing subpacket type 10), Hal Finney
103-microsecond 2048-bit verification on a Pentium-133, D. J. Bernstein
V4 Fingerprints, Thomas Roessler
- Re: V4 Fingerprints, Lutz Donnerhacke
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: V4 Fingerprints, Hal Finney
The armour issue, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The armour issue, Gavan Schneider
  - Re: The armour issue, Jon Callas
    - Re: The armour issue, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - expedience, consensus and editing, Adam Back
    - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Adam Back
    - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ian Grigg
    - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ian Grigg
    - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Lutz Donnerhacke
    - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ryan Anderson
    - Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Bill Stewart
    - Re: The armour issue, Ian Brown
    - Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg
    - Re: The armour issue, Bill Stewart
    - Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg
    - Re: The armour issue, Ian Brown
- Re: The armour issue, Paul Rarey
  - Re: The armour issue, Ian Brown
    - Features issues..., Jon Callas
    - Re: The armour issue, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg
    - Re: The armour issue, Bill Frantz
    - Re: The armour issue, Jonathan Wienke
    - Re: The armour issue, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: The armour issue, Kent Crispin
    - Re: The armour issue, Kai Henningsen
- Re: The armour issue, Hal Finney
  - Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg
PGP, evolving., Black Unicorn
- Re: PGP, evolving., Ian Brown
Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Hal Finney
- Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Ian Grigg
  - Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, nospam-seesignature
    - US participation in International Standards (was: Re: Complexity...), Ian Grigg
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Hal Finney
  - Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, nospam-seesignature
PGP Implementor's survey, Tony Mione
Re: MUST accept 32 bit lols everywhere?, Peter Gutmann
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MUST accept 32 bit lols everywhere?, Hal Finney
Sternlight Drivel, Will Price
The web of trust has no clothes., David Sternlight
- Re: The web of trust has no clothes., Ian Grigg
  - Re: The web of trust has no clothes., David Sternlight
- Re: The web of trust has no clothes., Christopher Creutzig
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The web of trust has no clothes., Hal Finney
- Re: The web of trust has no clothes., David Sternlight
expediency and avoidance of politics, Adam Back
- Re: expediency and avoidance of politics, Ian Grigg
- Re: expediency and avoidance of politics, Bill Stewart
  - Re: expediency and avoidance of politics, Ian Grigg
Re: PGP 5.x will communicate with 2.6.x, Hal Finney
Re: PGP evolving, improving, David Sternlight
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, Ian Grigg
  - Re: PGP evolving, improving, Adam Back
  - Re: PGP evolving, improving, William H. Geiger III
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, Adam Back
  - Re: PGP evolving, improving, Uri Blumenthal
    - Re: PGP evolving, improving, David Sternlight
    - Re: PGP evolving, improving, Adam Back
    - Re: PGP evolving, improving, Jeremey Barrett
    - Re: PGP evolving, improving, Uri Blumenthal
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  - Re: PGP evolving, improving, David Sternlight
    - Re: PGP evolving, improving, robert . guerra
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  - Re: PGP evolving, improving, David Sternlight
Interoperability Policy of PGP Inc Clarified, Ian Grigg
hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Adam Back
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Ian Brown
  - Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, David Formosa
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Ian Grigg
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Will Price
  - MUST accept 32 bit lols everywhere?, Adam Back
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Peter Gutmann
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Peter Gutmann
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Hal Finney
  - Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Adam Back
  - Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Ian Grigg
    - Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Adam Back
    - Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Ian Grigg
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Hal Finney
  - Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Jon Callas
    - OpenPGP version2 plan?, Adam Back
Re: CMR as an extension _inside_ the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Hal Finney
Why Rabin algorithm has mostly been ignored?, Gary Liu
- Re: Why Rabin algorithm has mostly been ignored?, Jon Callas
  - Message not available
    - Re: Why Rabin algorithm has mostly been ignored?, Gary Liu
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why Rabin algorithm has mostly been ignored?, Hal Finney
Re: Armour, Rodney Thayer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Armour, Hal Finney
- Re: Armour, Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: Armour, Hal Finney
  - Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC
  - Re: Armour, Adam Back
    - Re: Armour, David Formosa
    - Re: Armour, Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: Armour, Hal Finney
- Re: Armour, Gavan Schneider
  - Re: Armour, Ian Brown
Ancient Technology, Alex Le Heux
- Re: Ancient Technology, David Formosa
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Ancient Technology, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
CMR, Ian Brown
- Re: CMR, Kent Crispin
  - Re: CMR, Ian Brown
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CMR, Ian Brown
  - Re: CMR, Jon Callas
    - Re: CMR, Adam Back
- re: CMR, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Dave Crocker / IMC
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Lindsay Mathieson
  - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Dave Crocker / IMC
Ascii Armor solution?, William H. Geiger III
- Re: Ascii Armor solution?, Ian Brown
  - Re: Ascii Armor solution?, William H. Geiger III
- Re: Ascii Armor solution?, Lutz Donnerhacke
  - Re: Ascii Armor solution?, William H. Geiger III
The Case Against MIME, William H. Geiger III
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Ian Brown
  - Re: The Case Against MIME, Thomas Roessler
    - Re: The Case Against MIME, Ian Brown
    - Re: The Case Against MIME, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: The Case Against MIME, Harald . T . Alvestrand
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Jeremey Barrett
  - Re: The Case Against MIME, Ian Brown
    - The case against redundancy and isolation, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jeremey Barrett
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Ian Brown
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Thomas Roessler
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jeremey Barrett
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jim McCoy
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, David Formosa
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Kent Crispin
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Ian Brown
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Kent Crispin
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jeremey Barrett
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Ian Brown
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Kent Crispin
    - why MIME in the standard?, Adam Back
    - Re: why MIME in the standard?, Ian Grigg
    - Re: why MIME in the standard?, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Ian Brown
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jeremey Barrett
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jon Callas
    - Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Adam Back
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re[2]: The Case Against MIME, greg . vaudreuil
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Lindsay Mathieson
A first set of comments, Thomas Roessler
Draft comments, Ian Brown
- Re: Draft comments, Lutz Donnerhacke
- CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments), Adam Back
  - Re: CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments), Ian Grigg
    - CMR as an extension outside the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Adam Back
    - Re: CMR as an extension outside the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Ian Grigg
    - Re: CMR as an extension _inside_ the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Bill Stewart
    - Re: CMR as an extension _inside_ the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Ian Grigg
    - case for removing subpacket type 10, Adam Back
    - Re: case for removing subpacket type 10, Ian Brown
    - Re: case for removing subpacket type 10, Ian Grigg
    - PGP 5.x will communicate with 2.6.x, Jonathan Wienke
    - Re: PGP 5.x will communicate with 2.6.x, Adam Back
    - Re: CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments), David Formosa
- Re: Draft comments, Jon Callas
  - Re: Draft comments, Lutz Donnerhacke
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Draft comments, Hal Finney
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-00.txt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- <Possible follow-ups>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-00.txt, stewarts
Receipt mechanism(s), Karen Rosenthal
Draft on the way, John W. Noerenberg
closedPGP vs openSMIME, Anonymous
- Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, William H. Geiger III
- <Possible follow-ups>
- closedPGP vs openSMIME, Rodney Thayer
  - Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, Ian Grigg
    - Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, Ned Freed
    - Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, John W. Noerenberg
    - Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, John W. Noerenberg
    - Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, Ned Freed
extension mechanism needed, Adam Back
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Ian Brown
  - Re: extension mechanism needed, Bill Stewart
    - Re: extension mechanism needed, Jon Callas
    - Armour, Ian Brown
    - Re: Armour, John W. Noerenberg
    - Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: Armour, Bill Stewart
    - Re: Armour, Jon Callas
    - Re: Armour, Ian Brown
    - Re: Armour, Uri Blumenthal
    - Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: Armour, Jeremey Barrett
    - Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: Armour, Ng Pheng Siong
    - Re: Armour, Ian Brown
    - Re: Armour, Jon Callas
    - Re: Armour, Kent Crispin
    - Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: Armour, Kent Crispin
    - Re: Armour, David Formosa
    - Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: Armour, Ian Grigg
    - Re: Armour, David Hayes
    - Re: Armour, David Formosa
    - Re: Armour, David Formosa
    - Re: Armour, Ian Brown
    - Re: Armour, Kent Crispin
    - Re: Armour, Ian Brown
    - Re: Armour, Jim McCoy
    - Re: Armour, David Formosa
    - Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC
    - Re: Armour, Jon Callas
    - Re: Armour, Jon Callas
    - The spec is unconventional, nospam-seesignature
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Ian Brown
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Bill Stewart
  - Re: extension mechanism needed, Adam Back
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Jon Callas
  - Re: extension mechanism needed, Adam Back
    - Re: extension mechanism needed, Lutz Donnerhacke
clearsigned sigs, Ian Grigg
- Re: clearsigned sigs, Bill Frantz
- CTC-PGP5 - Interoperability, Robert Guerra
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: clearsigned sigs, mark
- Re: clearsigned sigs, Hal Finney
  - Re: clearsigned sigs, Ian Brown
    - Re: clearsigned sigs, William H. Geiger III
  - Re: clearsigned sigs, Ian Grigg
  - Re: clearsigned sigs, William H. Geiger III
specifying, Robert Guerra
- Re: specifying, Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: specifying, Jon Callas
base64 signature test, Ben Escoto
- Re: base64 signature test, $B;3K\OBI'(B
- Re: base64 signature test, William H. Geiger III
Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Lindsay Mathieson
Re: IETF process, Rodney Thayer
- patent freedom & compatibility, Adam Back
  - Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Rodney Thayer
    - Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    - Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Ian Grigg
    - Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    - Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Ian Grigg
    - Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: IETF process, Ned Freed
  - Re: IETF process, Ian Grigg
    - Re: IETF process, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    - Re: IETF process, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}
    - Re: IETF process, Ned Freed
    - Re: IETF process, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IETF process, David P. Kemp
- Re: IETF process, Alain Zahm
  - Re: IETF process, William H. Geiger III
    - Re: IETF process, Bill Frantz
  - Re: IETF process, Ned Freed
Bravo!, Darryl L. Rowe
- Re: Bravo!, Lance Cottrell
Re[2]: IETF process (was How many 2.6 users?), Chris Bartram
RE: Conflicts and Options..., Ron Craswell
- Re: Conflicts and Options..., Ian Grigg
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Conflicts and Options..., Ron Craswell
- Re: Conflicts and Options..., Tom Phinney
  - Re: Conflicts and Options..., Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: Conflicts and Options..., Peter Gutmann
  - Re: Conflicts and Options..., Lutz Donnerhacke

Page 53 of 55
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.