Archive of ietf-openpgp, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-openpgp
Page 53 of 55
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Are You Happy!,
vE0RQ1lEW
- SPKI in OpenPGP format,
Vinnie Moscaritolo
- Please Fix,
William H. Geiger III
- The canonical <CR><LF> in rfc2015,
Hiroyuki Yamada
- proposed FP sig subpacket type,
Vinnie Moscaritolo
- OpenPGP WG meeting minutes,
John W. Noerenberg
- CyberNews,
Il207y3z3
- Lost Messages,
William H. Geiger III
- Re: Speculative Mode for KeyIDs of all zeroes,
Hal Finney
- message integrity checksum?,
Adam Back
- Key Extraction odd behavior ???,
William H. Geiger III
- section 4.3,
William H. Geiger III
- Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Will Price
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
EKR
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Will Price
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
EKR
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Tom Weinstein
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
William H. Geiger III
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Tom Weinstein
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
William H. Geiger III
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Anthony E. Greene
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Ned Freed
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
William H. Geiger III
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Steve Schear
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Will Price
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Tom Weinstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Will Price
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
EKR
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Will Price
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
EKR
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Anthony E. Greene
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Steve Schear
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
EKR
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
William H. Geiger III
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Steve Schear
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
EKR
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
William H. Geiger III
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Steve Schear
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
EKR
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Steve Schear
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
William H. Geiger III
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Jeff Williams
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Steve Schear
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
Adam Back
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP,
A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- G10: The Free PGP Replacement,
Robert Guerra
- Where is the symmetric algorithm defined?,
Lutz Donnerhacke
- Improving resistance against attacks,
Patrick Feisthammel
- Re: Possible attack on remailer keys?,
Bill Stewart
- Re: Handling 8-bit cleartext signatures - a proposal (Was: Re: O,
Maksim Otstavnov
- PGP 5 (i, source) question...,
Rodney Thayer
- DSA and patents,
Werner Koch
- co-chair resigns,
Charles Breed
- r.e. code fragments in the documents,
Rodney Thayer
- We bulk Email for You,
6vc8eqq93
- PGP Inc. cleans off the KRAP,
Peter Gutmann
- Lasers/Optics/Optical Tables - Save!,
H1CAK5mNb
- More draft comments,
Tony Mione
- Re: DSS lengths,
Peter Gutmann
- Discrete log signature key sizes,
Hal Finney
- Fingerprints once again...,
Thomas Roessler
- OP and pgp5.0i: some problems,
Maksim Otstavnov
- Comments on current draft,
Tony Mione
- PGP Implementor's survey : First results snapshot available,
Tony Mione
- Comments on draft - Long.,
Bill Stewart
- What is going on?!?,
William H. Geiger III
- new algorithm identifier of the symmetric cryptosystem.,
Hironobu Suzuki
- rhetoric,
James Howard
- Sternlight,
Secret Squirrel
- [LISTBIZ] A Point of Order,
Dave Del Torto
- David, are you listening?,
James Howard
- [no subject],
Anonymous
- 25 Million S/MIME Users,
Lindsay Mathieson
- David, get stuffed.,
James Howard
- Helpful,
Mix
- test56,
Raviv
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?,
Steve Crocker
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?,
Steve Crocker
- Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?,
Gunther Schadow
- PGP/MIME is not an alternative to ascii armor,
Hal Finney
- Re: The Web of Trust Has No Clothes,
David Sternlight
- Long term contracts,
Ian Grigg
- Re: PGP/MIME2,
Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Hal Finney
- PGP/MIME2,
Ian Brown
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Hal Finney
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Hal Finney
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Hal Finney
- PGP, MIME, and Armour,
A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- Critical bit (was: case for removing subpacket type 10),
Hal Finney
- 103-microsecond 2048-bit verification on a Pentium-133,
D. J. Bernstein
- V4 Fingerprints,
Thomas Roessler
- The armour issue,
A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The armour issue,
Gavan Schneider
- Re: The armour issue,
Jon Callas
- Re: The armour issue,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- expedience, consensus and editing,
Adam Back
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Adam Back
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Ian Grigg
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Ian Grigg
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Ryan Anderson
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing,
Bill Stewart
- Re: The armour issue,
Ian Brown
- Re: The armour issue,
Ian Grigg
- Re: The armour issue,
Bill Stewart
- Re: The armour issue,
Ian Grigg
- Re: The armour issue,
Ian Brown
- Re: The armour issue,
Paul Rarey
- Re: The armour issue,
Hal Finney
- PGP, evolving.,
Black Unicorn
- Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment,
Hal Finney
- PGP Implementor's survey,
Tony Mione
- Re: MUST accept 32 bit lols everywhere?,
Peter Gutmann
- Sternlight Drivel,
Will Price
- The web of trust has no clothes.,
David Sternlight
- expediency and avoidance of politics,
Adam Back
- Re: PGP 5.x will communicate with 2.6.x,
Hal Finney
- Re: PGP evolving, improving,
David Sternlight
- Interoperability Policy of PGP Inc Clarified,
Ian Grigg
- hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ,
Adam Back
- Re: CMR as an extension _inside_ the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13),
Hal Finney
- Why Rabin algorithm has mostly been ignored?,
Gary Liu
- Re: Armour,
Rodney Thayer
- Ancient Technology,
Alex Le Heux
- CMR,
Ian Brown
- Re: CMR,
Kent Crispin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CMR,
Ian Brown
- re: CMR,
A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
- Ascii Armor solution?,
William H. Geiger III
- The Case Against MIME,
William H. Geiger III
- Re: The Case Against MIME,
Ian Brown
- Re: The Case Against MIME,
Jeremey Barrett
- Re: The Case Against MIME,
Ian Brown
- The case against redundancy and isolation,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Jeremey Barrett
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Ian Brown
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Thomas Roessler
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Jeremey Barrett
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Jim McCoy
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
David Formosa
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Kent Crispin
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Ian Brown
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Kent Crispin
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Jeremey Barrett
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Ian Brown
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Kent Crispin
- why MIME in the standard?,
Adam Back
- Re: why MIME in the standard?,
Ian Grigg
- Re: why MIME in the standard?,
William H. Geiger III
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Ian Brown
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Jeremey Barrett
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Jon Callas
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation,
Adam Back
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re[2]: The Case Against MIME,
greg . vaudreuil
- Re: The Case Against MIME,
Lindsay Mathieson
- A first set of comments,
Thomas Roessler
- Draft comments,
Ian Brown
- Re: Draft comments,
Lutz Donnerhacke
- CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments),
Adam Back
- Re: CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments),
Ian Grigg
- CMR as an extension outside the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13),
Adam Back
- Re: CMR as an extension outside the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13),
Ian Grigg
- Re: CMR as an extension _inside_ the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13),
Bill Stewart
- Re: CMR as an extension _inside_ the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13),
Ian Grigg
- case for removing subpacket type 10,
Adam Back
- Re: case for removing subpacket type 10,
Ian Brown
- Re: case for removing subpacket type 10,
Ian Grigg
- PGP 5.x will communicate with 2.6.x,
Jonathan Wienke
- Re: PGP 5.x will communicate with 2.6.x,
Adam Back
- Re: CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments),
David Formosa
- Re: Draft comments,
Jon Callas
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Draft comments,
Hal Finney
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Receipt mechanism(s),
Karen Rosenthal
- Draft on the way,
John W. Noerenberg
- closedPGP vs openSMIME,
Anonymous
- extension mechanism needed,
Adam Back
- Re: extension mechanism needed,
Ian Brown
- Re: extension mechanism needed,
Bill Stewart
- Re: extension mechanism needed,
Jon Callas
- Armour,
Ian Brown
- Re: Armour,
John W. Noerenberg
- Re: Armour,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- Re: Armour,
Bill Stewart
- Re: Armour,
Jon Callas
- Re: Armour,
Ian Brown
- Re: Armour,
Uri Blumenthal
- Re: Armour,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- Re: Armour,
Jeremey Barrett
- Re: Armour,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- Re: Armour,
Ng Pheng Siong
- Re: Armour,
Ian Brown
- Re: Armour,
Jon Callas
- Re: Armour,
Kent Crispin
- Re: Armour,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- Re: Armour,
Kent Crispin
- Re: Armour,
David Formosa
- Re: Armour,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- Re: Armour,
Ian Grigg
- Re: Armour,
David Hayes
- Re: Armour,
David Formosa
- Re: Armour,
David Formosa
- Re: Armour,
Ian Brown
- Re: Armour,
Kent Crispin
- Re: Armour,
Ian Brown
- Re: Armour,
Jim McCoy
- Re: Armour,
David Formosa
- Re: Armour,
Dave Crocker / IMC
- Re: Armour,
Jon Callas
- Re: Armour,
Jon Callas
- The spec is unconventional,
nospam-seesignature
- Re: extension mechanism needed,
Ian Brown
- Re: extension mechanism needed,
Bill Stewart
- Re: extension mechanism needed,
Jon Callas
- clearsigned sigs,
Ian Grigg
- specifying,
Robert Guerra
- base64 signature test,
Ben Escoto
- Re: patent freedom & compatibility,
Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: IETF process,
Rodney Thayer
- Bravo!,
Darryl L. Rowe
- Re[2]: IETF process (was How many 2.6 users?),
Chris Bartram
- RE: Conflicts and Options...,
Ron Craswell
Page 53 of 55
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.