--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Michael W. Condry" <condry@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: BOF, not final
- From: Dave Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:20:40 -0700
- Cc: cache@xxxxxxx
- Organization: Digital Island
- References: <39741D00.C51B9324@condry.org> <39748668.1E7A07C7@digisle.net> <3985A2EA.658C8A6C@condry.org>
Michael, I sent the note you are responding to a few weeks ago, when you said there would be no BOF. I am now planning to come to the dinner. Also, I was contacted today by Matt Haines of Inktomi. He plans to come to the BOF dinner and the wrec meeting. I'll forward the info to him. Dave "Michael W. Condry" wrote: > > We are going to have then official BOF dinner on Thursday, I thought > you were coming. On Friday, we have time at WREC. > > Now, I have been invited to the private session on working > group futures for applications and will go. > > If not enough folks are interested in the dinner I will just cancel > it > > Dave Farber wrote: > > > If we don't have an official BOF, should we have an unofficial one? > > Wrec is not scheduled either, from what I can see, nor is there an iCAP BOF. > > I'm wondering whether I should even plan to go.... > > > > Dave > > > > "Michael W> Condry" wrote: > > > > > > There is not a final word on the BOF. However, I talked to Patrick, and he said > > > there was significant problem with slots at IETF48. He did not know about > > > our BOF status but he had to turn down 4 BOFs and several extra working > > > group requests because of slot space. > > > > > > Sooooo, its likely that we will not get a BOF this time. However, regardless > > > we may be shooting for a Working group in IETF49! > > > > > > There is a lot of interest here!
--- End Message ---