Re: IAB Requirement for OPES

[Leslie Daigle <leslie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Howdy,

Speaking for myself, I would propose that even "read only" services
like logging/billing should require at least one-party consent.  
It's still a traffic diversion, and reading is sometimes as destructive
as a modify.

Leslie.

Markus Hofmann wrote:
> 
> Ian Cooper wrote:
> 
> > The examples you give seem more closely related to ones that could be
> > performed in a proxy, or indeed a router (depending on which layer you
> > want your logs/bills to consider).  As such I don't really see what they
> > would have to do with OPES per se., though I can understand why you're
> > asking the question.
> 
> Yup, agreed, the given services are typically more closely related to
> devices such as the ones you mentioned (hmm..., a "proxy" could
> possible run a local OPES proxylet for logging/billing, what about
> this case?).
> 
> I'm just wondering whether this consideration rules out realizing such
> services in an OPES framework and whether this is intentional or
> whether we need more clarification on this.
> 
> -Markus

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
"An essential element of a successful journey
    is recognizing when you have arrived."
   -- ThinkingCat

Leslie Daigle
leslie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------------------