Re: FW: Issues raised in opes-enforcement and opes-threat conference call

[Arumugam K <akolappa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chan Tat,

> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:         Chan Tat (NRC/Boston)
> > Sent: August 09, 2002 02:22 PM
> > To:   'opes-threat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx';
> > 'opes-enforcement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject:      Issues raised in opes-enforcement and
> > opes-threat conference call
> >

<snip>

> > 4. Should end-user only authorization be supported? For
> > instance, if a data consumer wants to perform language
> > translation to the web page he/she requests, should he/she be
> > the one who would authorize the OPES device which performs
> > the transformation. Should the content provider be notified
> > that the content they provide is being modified? There are
> > some copyright issues in there, since the transformation may
> > have already infringed the copyright of the content owner.
> >

There is an advantage in notifying the content provider when the data is
modified by opes device. The provider will come to know which lang. the
content 
is transformed the most. So that the provider could keep a copy of the
content
in the same language. Thus he could contribute on avoiding that many
opes 
transformations.

Thanks
Arumugham

-- 
Want to know CDN?
http://cdn.hcltech.com