[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Protocol next steps
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Again, we now need to decide whether the draft should be submitted as
a working group draft. If there are some modifications that must
happen first, please let me know, but let's not argue too much about
specifics until the draft is published (so that we have a clear
As Alex mentioned, this draft tries to summarize the dicussions we had
on the mailing list on the protocol issue. As such, I would assume it
reflects the current thinking of the WG reasonably well, and it might
be worthwhile to publish this as a WG document. Obviously, the
document will change with input from others in the WG and additional
authors might get added, but it seems like a good starting point for
our WG document.
Please spend some time to carefully review the document and provide
any feedback you have to the mailing list.